Envision “chestnuts roasting on an open fire.”
Most of us have never actually done that, but we at least entertain the thought when Nat King Cole sings that phrase.
Now, using the same tune, substitute these words — “Hauteans falling off the fiscal cliff.”
Somehow, it feels less festive.
Yes, it is tempting to dive into the partisan bickering over the federal fiscal cliff. The arguments in Washington, in newspapers, on TV, online and on Facebook are truly heart-warming, in the same sense as eating a plate of fresh habaneros. The geekier, less noisy option is to crunch a few numbers, before crunching those roasted chestnuts. That way, you get to the bottom line that Ray Kinsella faced in the movie “Field of Dreams.”
For those who’ve never seen the flick — really? — mysterious voices told Kinsella, a struggling Iowa farmer, to carve a baseball diamond out of his valuable cornfield. After doing so, Kinsella feels snubbed by a team of baseball-legend ghosts and confronts its ringleader, “Shoeless” Joe Jackson. Kinsella tells Jackson, “I did it all. I listened to the voices, I did what they told me, and not once did I ask what’s in it for me.”
“What are you saying, Ray,” Jackson asks.
Kinsella, stumbling, answers, “I’m saying … what’s in it for me.”
And, truth be told, that is what many Americans want to know about the outcome of the fiscal cliff debate.
“I think that’s what people are asking — how is it going to affect me?” said Roberton Williams, senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the nonpartisan Urban Institute and Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
Instead of wading into the political fray to find the answer, the Tax Policy Center has created one of the best fiscal cliff tax calculators online. (You can find it at calculator.taxpolicy
center.org.) This calculator lets you compare four different outcomes to the negotiations between President Obama and Congress concerning the fiscal cliff. The fiscal cliff buzzword refers to the penalty for congressional inaction on the federal budget, which will impose automatic tax increases on most Americans in 2013, coupled with deep spending cuts to the military, education and other domestic programs on Jan. 1 if Congress and the president can’t agree on a deal.
So, pop in Tony Bennett’s “Snowfall” Christmas album, pull out your 2011 tax returns (to be as accurate as possible), plug in the numbers and let the tax calculator do the math.
The program offers four different fiscal cliff scenarios — a status-quo extension of the current 2012 law; failure to reach an agreement, thus, triggering the automatic fiscal cliff actions; the Senate Republican proposal (offering to close tax loopholes but not to raise tax rates); and the Senate Democratic proposal backed by the president (trimming spending while increasing taxes on the wealthiest 2 percent), which gained momentum as last week progressed. The calculator allows you to compare two outcomes at a time, as in your taxes under the Republican idea vs. your taxes under the Democratic plan.
The calculation may surprise some. About 90 percent of the Republican and Democratic plans mirror each other, Williams said. The primary difference, in terms of a household’s tax calculation, is that lower-income earners would pay more in taxes under the GOP proposal, while top-2-percent earners would pay more under the Democratic plan. The middle-income bracket faces a lesser impact.
Also, it’s important to remember the two-year reduction in the payroll tax — which funds Social Security and Medicare — expires at year’s end, under all four scenarios. (This week, a few members of Congress mentioned adding a payroll-tax-cut extension to the fiscal cliff deliberations, so its inclusion could revise tax calculations.)
The Tax Policy Center’s tax calculator site also summarizes the macro-economic effect of the varying plans, “but it’s really painful to work through that,” Williams said by telephone from Washington on Wednesday. “Therefore, I don’t recommend that.” Instead, the calculator puts the numbers an average person needs to know at the top, such as total tax liability, income-tax liability, average income-tax rate and marginal income-tax rate.
Just to keep the mood light, punch in the tax for a millionaire, Mitt Romney or the president. (The latter two are available online.)
As the calculator crunches on, you also may want to sip egg nog and linger over the alternative minimum tax calculation. In a chestnut shell, the number of middle- and upper-middle income Americans paying the heftier “AMT” could grow from 4 million now to 30 million if its usual adjustment for inflation gets altered by the fiscal cliff bargaining.
“Those are the things that are going to hit people on the fiscal cliff,” Williams said.
All the more reason for Congress to stop arguing, let signs of Republican-Democratic cooperation take root, and get the mess resolved. The gap between the two sides, especially the hard-liners, remains wide. A response from Larry Bucshon, the U.S. House rep from Indiana’s 8th District, to last Sunday’s Tribune-Star editorial exemplified the division. The editorial urged Bucshon and other signers of the Grover Norquist no-tax-increase pledge to find common ground with Democrats and the president through compromise, and back away from the pledge’s rigid stance.
“The Norquist pledge is not holding up anything,” Bucshon answered in an email to the Tribune-Star. “People like myself hold those values or we would not have signed. I don’t sign pledges in general for the reasons many have outlined. What is holding up the process is the President’s envy and divide campaign to raise taxes on the very people we expect to create jobs. The American people should not take the bait, stick together, and help find solutions that work. Raising taxes on the so-called rich to pay for government programs is the holy grail of liberalism. This is a very slippery slope that will ultimately lead to higher taxes on everyone. When they wake up and look at the facts of the case on government spending and the course of our entitlement programs, we might get somewhere. I will not support any taxpayers sending more money to D.C. Both parties for decades have avoided the tough choices that are necessary when you are a leader.”
Some issues, obviously, can’t be solved by the calculator.
Mark Bennett can be reached at 812-231-4377 or email@example.com.
Envision “chestnuts roasting on an open fire.”
EDITORIAL: A timely call-out of NSA critics
As if it couldn’t get worse, politicians in Washington have again tied themselves in knots.
Yes, we know. What else is new?
READERS' FORUM: June 19, 2013
• Nutrition info falling short
RONN MOTT: Why Syria?
Russia is making a lot of noise in favor of Syria. They are supplying Assad’s army with more armaments and basic things such as ammunition and such.
LIZ CIANCONE: Another beloved dog goes to heaven
We are short one granddog. This past week, “Indy” could no longer use her back legs and she went to that great dog kennel in the hereafter.
READERS’ FORUM: June 18, 2013
• Beware those who follow Ayn Rand
• Poor excuse for gas price hikes
MAX JONES: For loyal readers, a bit of news from the T-S newsroom
As journalists toiling to create a content-rich, relevant and compelling community newspaper each day, we feel a special bond with our legions of readers across the Wabash Valley and beyond.
GUEST COLUMN: One Million Bones exhibit meant to raise awareness, inspire action to end genocide
The National Mall: A grassy corridor in Washington, D.C., lined with America’s greatest museums and monuments.
Ending at the U.S. Capitol building, it is a symbol of our belief in the power and greatness of America. Last weekend, we turned it into a mass grave.
EDITORIAL: Insisting on ISTEP quality lawmakers’ primary duty
Now that everyone, on both sides of the aisle, seems backslappingly happy to agree that this spring’s ISTEP school testing debacle was unacceptable, that at least some of the results lack credibility and that the issue carries high-stakes significance, what next?
The Obama Debate: Is he a liar or incompetent?
I read the letters on the opinion page daily and I find an unusual silence from your liberal progressive contributors lately. Could it be because they don’t have anything to expound upon? Well, maybe I can give them some material.
A Fathers Day Tribute: Transition — from child to father
Transition seems like a big word to use as his story unfolds. Transition was probably never used in conjunction with speech, his speech, but it demonstrates his life, as it does in many lives lived in his generation.
READERS' FORUM: June 16, 2013
Horrible crime cries out for stern justice
Confused about groups’ merger
Global warming fraud exposed
The Obama Debate: President has served us well
I have not heard a positive thing by those in this area about this president since his 2008 election and 2009 inauguration. Why this manifestation, I just can’t understand.
RONN MOTT: Not hurried a bit by 21st century tech
Unlike so many of you, I do not get up in the morning and run to turn on my computer. In fact, if you need to reach me in a hurry, I would say that 19th century invention of Alexander Bell’s would be the best way. If you do email me or use some other electronic convenience, better give it a couple of days because I am not in that big of a hurry.
READERS' FORUM: June 15, 2013
America needs another hero
EDITORIAL: And now we wait for justice
It is a word we would rather never have on our front page — homicide. That we had to use it twice on Wednesday’s front page is sad, but unavoidable.
READERS' FORUM: June 14, 2013
Mott statements contradict history
Display the flag
RONN MOTT: Kill the Umpire!
I don’t know who appointed Major League Baseball’s umpires “Gods,” but if they have been appointed “Gods,” they have appointed people who cannot see or think very well.
READERS' FORUM: June 13, 2013
Bad odor from gas prices
Build personal library
Morning after? No worries
EDITORIAL: Remembering Sister Jeanne
Terre Haute is mourning the loss this week of an accomplished and beloved community activist and leader whose life’s work is an inspiration to all who strive to serve.
EDITORIAL: Embrace the value of traffic planning
Never underestimate the value of a good plan to deal with a crisis, large or small, even if the final analysis of the management of a specific crisis is, “It could have been worse.”
READERS' FORUM: June 12, 2013
Like it or not, change coming
RONN MOTT: What’s happening?
I know I may have looked at these situations differently when I was in my twenties. The world, my life, my career, and the growth of my family all lay ahead of me. So perhaps now, many years later, I see it differently.
READERS’ FORUM: June 11, 2013
• Great support for local cause
• Another idea on housing issue
LIZ CIANCONE: Withdrawn society not very social any more
My Best Friend and I went out for lunch the other day. It was a sit-down place with our own “server” (in my day I was called “a waitress”) and everything offering personal attention. The manager even came over to ask if everything was all right.
READERS’ FORUM: June 10, 2013
• What is the cost of our austerity?
• Vintage campers to gather at rally
• Seek a healthy food alternative
EDITORIAL: It’s time to assess ISTEP
Later this month, the company behind this spring’s abysmal online administration of ISTEP testing for 27,000 Hoosier schoolchildren is being called to the principal’s office.
Readers’ Forum: June 9, 2013
• Taking time to help the world
• Reform by politics will not improve education
• Questions from a wondering mind
FLASHPOINT: Storm chasers must heed warnings, remember why we chase storms
The tragic death of noted weather researcher and former Discovery Channel storm chaser Tim Samaras has shaken all of us in the meteorological community.
Will you be happy if you win the lottery?
A Psychology Today article titled “What Will You Do if You Win the $550 Million Powerball Lottery?” caught my attention. Helping lottery winners with their money is my long-time gig.
- RONN MOTT: The ‘wilds’ of Collett Park
- More Opinion Headlines
- EDITORIAL: A timely call-out of NSA critics