TERRE HAUTE — He lied under a different oath, and that’s the oath to his wife. So it’s got to be taken very, very seriously.
— then-U.S. Rep. Mark Sanford on his impeachment vote against President Bill Clinton
When news broke about South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and his affair with a woman from Buenos Aires, I was in a meeting near a television set. As the story unfolded during the governor’s fascinating press conference, I said, “Whenever another one of these guys gets caught, it really brightens my day.”
A male colleague said, “These guys? You mean just guys, right?”
No, I do not mean just guys.
It is not about the cheating, which (unless I am being cheated on) is none of my business.
It is not about the lying, which (be it guy, gal, Republican, Democrat, Christian, Muslim, Jew or atheist) tends to follow cheating as night follows day.
It isn’t even about Sanford’s unique version of cheating and lying — hiking the Appalachian Trail to Argentina. After all, if Elizabeth Edwards’ public statements are any indication, Democrat John Edwards has convinced his wife he was practically mugged into bed by the woman who became his mistress.
And who can forget Newt Gingrich’s hospitalized wife getting divorce papers or Bill Clinton’s “that depends on what ‘is’ is”?
The happy-making element of the disgraced conservative Sanford is that he is the hypocrite du jour on a very long list. The tally includes such luminaries as the late Illinois Congressman Henry Hyde — with a years-long extra-marital affair he conducted in his 40s and termed a “youthful indiscretion” — and the dethroned mega-pastor, Ted Haggard, whose secret weakness turned out to be professional boy toys.
My day is made when one of these guys (or rare gal) is exposed as a cheat and liar because it ruins all the sanctimonious judging of others that preceded their fall from pseudo grace.
My glee is a reaction to pseudo grace, to the gospel according to one societal segment’s literal, dogmatic, Bible-thumping interpretation of human behavior.
It is about this societal segment force feeding its narrow “ideals” down the throats of tens of millions of us who know right from wrong but do not care to make hollering about it a national pastime.
It is about the hijacking of “family values” by pandering politicians who’ve turned the fundamentalist desires of some religious zealots into a U.S. credo that dissenters reject at their peril.
It is about Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush doing 180s into the White House on safe, legal abortion and contraception, and endangering the lives of millions of women around the world by transforming the United Nations Population Fund into a political Ping-Pong ball.
I cheer the humiliation of yet another “family values” cheerleader because family values need to be about real families that reflect 2009 America, not a 1950s ad for a kitchen appliance.
Reality: Just over half of all U.S. households consist of one married man and woman and their child or children. That means nearly half do not.
American families come in all sizes and configurations. People who do more than pontificate and condemn, who actually take the time to get to know their neighbors, coworkers and fellow parishioners, discover that the family values of non-traditional families are remarkably similar to those of traditionally grouped families.
Adults who love each other want to build stable, supportive lives together. They want commitment, honesty and respect from one another. Those who bring children into the world — or adopt someone else’s castaways — want to provide a safe, nurturing home in a safe, nurturing neighborhood. They want their kids to play and enjoy childhood, to receive a good education and quality health care that will allow them to grow and mature into productive citizens.
Just about every parent on Earth wants someday to be a grandparent.
You would never know about this vast common ground if you listened only to the steady din of divisive rhetoric from self-appointed “family values” advocates.
The noise began about three decades ago, ironically, under one of the most religious, family-oriented presidents in this nation’s history, Jimmy Carter. As documented by William Martin in his book, “With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America,” a grass-roots movement of disaffected conservative Christians perceived the Southern Baptist Carter as a threat to the American family.
“Left Behind” author Tim LaHaye recalled praying after meeting with Carter, “God, we have to get this man out of the White House and get someone in here who will be aggressive about bringing back traditional moral values.”
Carter’s sin? Inclusion of people from diverse backgrounds and views in his President’s Conferences on the American Family.
What kind of people? Single parents, feminists, gays, racial and ethnic minorities. Or as one angry Christian activist who eventually helped derail Carter’s conferences put it, “the social welfare establishment.”
So, in came the divorced and remarried Reagan, born-again on abortion and family planning, and big on God-talk without the burden of having to regularly attend church. And in no time, a political party that long had stood for government keeping its nose out of people’s bedrooms and bodies, as well as their boardrooms and businesses, became the know-it-all dictator of morality for all.
It’s been hypocrites du jour ever since.
A few hours after Mark Sanford’s public confession, Jon Stewart performed his usual cut-through-the-BS function on The Daily Show.
Joking about all the possibilities that such mystery and deceit must portend, Stewart played the sound bite in which the governor said, “The bottom line is this: I have been unfaithful to my wife.”
Stewart reacted with an underwhelmed stare and said, “Oh … marital infidelity.”
After a pause, he added, sagely, “You’re just a run-of-the-mill human being whose simple moralizing about the sanctity of marriage is only marred by the complexities of their own life.”
Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com.
Opinion
STEPHANIE SALTER: Another weeping, repentant cheater? Go ahead, make my day
- Opinion
-
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Robins
I’m sure you know the American bird is the Bald Eagle and I’m sure you know it almost didn’t get that job.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 29, 2012
• ‘Laboring in a rut of Darwinism’
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Avoiding the heat no puzzle to Indy the dog
When it gets this hot, I’m with my eldest granddog, Indy. We both look for a room with a ceiling fan. She also demands that the room have a tile floor to cool both bottom and top. She has the floor of course, but there is a cool corner for me in a comfortable chair and a small table for my ice water.
-
EDITORIAL: Saluting his sacrifice
If you need a new reason to reflect upon the historic meaning of Memorial Day, let the ultimate sacrifice that Arronn D. Fields made a week ago today be your inspiration.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012
• Veterans, especially from WWII, deserve our lasting thanks
• All Bibles agree on ‘Golden Rule’
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you
Thank goodness, members of Congress do not drive in the Indianapolis 500.
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville
In the era of instant communication, the past seems to arrive much quicker.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Climbing the Ladder: 51 percent of the population in Indiana is female, and 31 of the 150
It was, utterly, one of the most painful political episodes I have ever had to watch as a political writer.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 27, 2012
• Alaska connection vital to Hoosiers who love wildlife
• Commissioners sell out Woodgate
• Same-sex marriage equalizes for all
• Mourdock can’t compromise on taxes
• Sweet lessons on ‘Lemonade Day’
• African Americans, slavery and Islam
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Confused
I am confused. For those who know me, that is not an unusual state. But, while listening to a political commercial on TV, I heard the announcer say the candidate was “real conservative.” If he is a “real conservative,” is someone not quite a “real conservative” an “unreal conservative”?
-
EDITORIAL: Towering response
It comes as incredibly sad news that a Garfield Towers resident has succumbed as the result of a fire last week at the northside apartment complex.
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
MARK BENNETT: 500 history runs in her veins, but she’ll pass on the buttermilk
Katy Balch appreciates tradition. The 20-year-old from Terre Haute understands how neatly her role as one of 33 Indianapolis 500 princesses fits her family.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: GSA Debacle
The recent General Services Administration debacle is enough to gag a whale.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
LIZ CIANCONE: She wasn’t hooked by the fishing hobby
I’m told that eveyone should have a hobby. If “hobby” means collecting something like stamps or coins, I don’t have one.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Cream of the crop
• Keep the ideas flowing
• Remembering fallen officers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
EDITORIAL: Hazards of the spring abundant now on I-70
A major holiday weekend is approaching. The weather has been consistently inviting for travel and outdoor activity. Gas prices are even inching downward.
-
MARK BENNETT: Roadway Role Models: Adults need to remember habits often rub off on teens
Plenty of dads connected with a car ad that first aired on TV two years ago.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
EDITORIAL: Embrace the Sycamores
Terre Haute should understand the rarity of an opportunity to celebrate a championship.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: ‘Political Super Pacs’
The Supreme Court has told us it is not constitutional to restrict how much money someone can put into a super political action committee.
-
EDITORIAL: Good choice for stability
For the first time in 25 years, Indiana will have a new chief justice for its Supreme Court. For those who value stability on the state’s highest court — and we count ourselves among those who do — the appointment Tuesday of longtime Justice Brent Dickson is good news.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
- More Opinion Headlines
-




