TERRE HAUTE — Awhile back, a reader left a voice mail telling me how much that day’s column “sickens me,” and how, in general, “I usually disagree with your writings. I don’t care for your style or your opinions and, quite honestly, I usually skip over your column.”
As ammunition against what my column had advocated — a national organization, Parents, Families and Friends of Gays and Lesbians — the caller said that people might be able to change their ideas about such things, “but the Bible doesn’t change.”
I’ve been thinking about that declaration ever since, most acutely on two occasions during this just-completed Lenten season.
The first was as I leafed through the now-battered Bible that was given to me as a child after I had completed the appropriate studies at the Methodist Temple — when the church and our family were located on the edges of Farrington’s Grove.
In a painstaking, four-page preface, the publishers of the Revised Standard Version Bible explained the historical and etymological journey of this particular edition. “Translated from the original tongues,” of Hebrew and Greek, it was first printed in 1611 and revised 1882-1885, revised again in 1901, then “compared with the most ancient authorities” and revised again in 1952.
The hero of this evolution, according to the preface, was William Tyndale, who produced and printed the “first English version of the Scriptures made by direct translation from the original Hebrew and Greek,” from about 1524 to 1536.
Many current sources cite Tyndale’s translations as pivotal to the mighty King James Version of the Bible. He is credited with introducing the English phrases, “Let there be light,” “the salt of the earth” and “my brother’s keeper.”
Tyndale also is recognized as the person who substituted the word “love” for the previously translated “charity” — as in 1 Corinthians, 13:13: “So faith, hope, love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.”
Other sources do not hold Tyndale in such high regard. In a history of English-translation Bibles, the online Catholic Encyclopedia gives Tyndale short shrift — 16 lines. By comparison, John Wyclifte (or Wyclif), who produced a 14th-century English translation of the Bible, garnered 53 lines.
In Tyndale’s own lifetime?
For all his impassioned effort to make the Scriptures accessible to everyone, even “a boy that driveth the plough,” Tyndale was arrested, publicly strangled and burned at the stake for heresy.
The second occasion on which I contemplated the statement “the Bible doesn’t change” was at the start of Holy Week.
As a Roman Catholic convert, I used “The Little Black Book,” a daily Lenten guide, to help me prepare for Easter. A product of the Diocese of Saginaw, Mich., the book is based on writings by the late Bishop Ken Untener, author of a gorgeous prayer that is often credited to the slain archbishop of El Salvador, Oscar Romero.
Each day the guide tends to teach biblical or church history on one page, then quotes Scripture on the other page. Questions are posed to help readers engage more deeply in a Lenten journey.
The Holy Week passage I mentioned explores the story of the woman who anointed Jesus with expensive oil. As the Little Black Book explains:
“All four Gospels tell the story of a woman who enters a house where Jesus is a dinner guest and anoints his feet with precious oil. But there are major differences in the details of their stories.”
The guide reviews the dissimilarities. In Matthew and Mark, a woman anoints Jesus’ head, and she is not identified as a sinner. In Luke, the woman is labeled as sinful. She encounters Jesus, weeps upon his feet, wipes them with her hair then kisses and anoints them.
In John, the woman has a name. More, she is a personal friend of Jesus, Mary, the sister of Martha and Lazarus. Mary anoints Christ’s feet and wipes them with her hair.
The Lenten guide explains that biblical scholars “believe that, as the stories were passed on in oral tradition [before the Gospels were written], two different events were mixed together.”
Before the Gospels were written. I am so often tempted to raise that point when another Christian (usually an angry Christian) refers to the Bible as “God’s word,” as if every syllable was dictated by the Lord — in American English — directly to a specific person with pen and papyrus in hand.
Biblical scholars through the ages have discovered much about the four Gospels, but as the behemoth reference book “The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought” humbly acknowledges, “it is impossible to ascertain when, where and by whom the gospels were written.”
Of the anointing woman, the Little Black Book explains that in “popular thought,” Luke’s sinful woman was “mistakenly thought to be Mary Magdalene,” probably because Luke previously described seven demons being cast out of Magdalene by Christ.
“This was a standard way of speaking of someone cured of sickness,” the Lenten guide says, “but some misunderstood it to mean sinfulness.”
Some still do. Mary Magdalene, who may have been afflicted with anything from migraines to fibromyalgia, remains a repentant prostitute in the minds, art and literature of many Christians — even though no evidence exists of such a life for her.
Speaking of Magdalene, she is named in three of the four Gospels as one of the women who accompanied Jesus and witnessed his crucifixion. Luke speaks only of “the women who had followed him from Galilee.”
Matthew, Mark and Luke all place the women at a distance or “afar,” but John has them “standing by the cross.” John’s is also the only account that identifies Jesus’ mother and his aunt among those faithful, heartbroken witnesses.
In the hours of research I’ve done while thinking about “the Bible doesn’t change,” I have read scores of arguments and theories about what various words and passages really mean. I’ve learned that the discovery of ancient texts in an Egyptian dump in 1885 blew away previous interpretations of some Greek terms.
So, too, I’ve discovered there are hundreds of translations of the Bible, at least 75 different versions here in North America. There are five main schools of thought as to why the King James Version is still supposedly the only genuine and true rendering of the word of God.
Does all of this — and the mandatory Old Testament death penalties for faking virginity, swearing at your parents and having sex with your wife during her menstrual period — make me want to chuck the Bible?
Not at all. While Christians believe the Bible is divinely inspired and that it’s “truth” is for all time, the book is inarguably the work of human beings. The Bible is language, and language — if is to remain alive and relevant — changes. To me, that’s the good news.
Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com.
Opinion
STEPHANIE SALTER: In the Bible, God — and humans — are in the details
- Opinion
-
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Robins
I’m sure you know the American bird is the Bald Eagle and I’m sure you know it almost didn’t get that job.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 29, 2012
• ‘Laboring in a rut of Darwinism’
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Avoiding the heat no puzzle to Indy the dog
When it gets this hot, I’m with my eldest granddog, Indy. We both look for a room with a ceiling fan. She also demands that the room have a tile floor to cool both bottom and top. She has the floor of course, but there is a cool corner for me in a comfortable chair and a small table for my ice water.
-
EDITORIAL: Saluting his sacrifice
If you need a new reason to reflect upon the historic meaning of Memorial Day, let the ultimate sacrifice that Arronn D. Fields made a week ago today be your inspiration.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012
• Veterans, especially from WWII, deserve our lasting thanks
• All Bibles agree on ‘Golden Rule’
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you
Thank goodness, members of Congress do not drive in the Indianapolis 500.
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville
In the era of instant communication, the past seems to arrive much quicker.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Climbing the Ladder: 51 percent of the population in Indiana is female, and 31 of the 150
It was, utterly, one of the most painful political episodes I have ever had to watch as a political writer.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 27, 2012
• Alaska connection vital to Hoosiers who love wildlife
• Commissioners sell out Woodgate
• Same-sex marriage equalizes for all
• Mourdock can’t compromise on taxes
• Sweet lessons on ‘Lemonade Day’
• African Americans, slavery and Islam
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Confused
I am confused. For those who know me, that is not an unusual state. But, while listening to a political commercial on TV, I heard the announcer say the candidate was “real conservative.” If he is a “real conservative,” is someone not quite a “real conservative” an “unreal conservative”?
-
EDITORIAL: Towering response
It comes as incredibly sad news that a Garfield Towers resident has succumbed as the result of a fire last week at the northside apartment complex.
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
MARK BENNETT: 500 history runs in her veins, but she’ll pass on the buttermilk
Katy Balch appreciates tradition. The 20-year-old from Terre Haute understands how neatly her role as one of 33 Indianapolis 500 princesses fits her family.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: GSA Debacle
The recent General Services Administration debacle is enough to gag a whale.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
LIZ CIANCONE: She wasn’t hooked by the fishing hobby
I’m told that eveyone should have a hobby. If “hobby” means collecting something like stamps or coins, I don’t have one.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Cream of the crop
• Keep the ideas flowing
• Remembering fallen officers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
EDITORIAL: Hazards of the spring abundant now on I-70
A major holiday weekend is approaching. The weather has been consistently inviting for travel and outdoor activity. Gas prices are even inching downward.
-
MARK BENNETT: Roadway Role Models: Adults need to remember habits often rub off on teens
Plenty of dads connected with a car ad that first aired on TV two years ago.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
EDITORIAL: Embrace the Sycamores
Terre Haute should understand the rarity of an opportunity to celebrate a championship.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: ‘Political Super Pacs’
The Supreme Court has told us it is not constitutional to restrict how much money someone can put into a super political action committee.
-
EDITORIAL: Good choice for stability
For the first time in 25 years, Indiana will have a new chief justice for its Supreme Court. For those who value stability on the state’s highest court — and we count ourselves among those who do — the appointment Tuesday of longtime Justice Brent Dickson is good news.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
- More Opinion Headlines
-




