BLOOMINGTON — Last week, the current session of the General Assembly reached its midpoint, when legislation must be exchanged between chambers. A proverbial flurry of bills and resolutions swirled inside the Statehouse.
In the plus column, one of the dumbest pieces of pending legislation swirled right out a Senate side door.
In the negative column, a bill that deserved much better got its guts sucked out and sent swirling down a House bathroom drain.
First the good news.
Senate Joint Resolution 15 proposed consideration of an amendment to Indiana’s Constitution, a serious move that requires two consecutive passages by the Senate and House, as well as a statewide voter referendum.
The burning issue? To ban same-gender marriages by inserting a “man-woman-only” definition of marriage in the state’s fundamental governing document.
Hey, you might say, I thought it already was illegal in Indiana for gays and lesbians to marry.
Hey, you would be right.
But a passel of state senators and reps see secular marriage of homosexual couples as a threat right up there with al Qaida. They are not about to rely on existing legal statutes. The definition of state-sanctioned “marriage” that they hear from church pulpits is the definition they want to stamp into the Constitution.
Four times since 2004 the Senate has passed such a resolution to no avail. Remarkably, this year’s version was stopped by a surprising source in the GOP-dominated chamber: The Senate Republican Caucus voted against offering the proposed amendment for consideration.
While Democrats are not without gay marriage foes among their ranks, monkeying with state constitutions tends to be more of a Republican thing. In the Democrat-controlled House, according to majority leader Pat Bauer, there is little traction for like measures that have been introduced.
Randy Studt, vice president of Indiana Equality Action, was gracious in semi-victory. His Hoosier cohorts had joined national gay rights groups to block the resolution.
In a news release, Studt said, “Indiana Equality is glad to see that the Senate has finally decided this issue is unworthy of their time, after passing a similar measure on four occasions.”
The flip side of the derailed marriage amendment was the sorry remnant of House Bill 1213 that was offered for a vote, and passed by a huge bipartisan majority.
Not long ago, HB 1213 looked like a much-overdue smoking ban in almost all enclosed spaces in which Hoosiers work, eat, drink, gamble, play and hang around. The most significant inclusions would have been restaurants, bars and casinos.
By the time various industry lobbyists were done, however, 1213 looked like Exemption City. Any bar, night club or restaurant that serves alcohol or doesn’t employ or serve people under the age of 18 gets a pass on the smoking prohibition.
Eighty percent of space inside casinos also can be thick with smoke, as can family-owned and operated businesses in which all employees are relatives.
How bad is the bill?
The version that passed the House is so bad, it was opposed by anti-smoking groups such as the Indiana Campaign for Smokefree Air.
Accustomed to accepting watered-down legislation over no legislation at all, these anti-smoking activists recognized several amendments to the bill as worse than useless — they saw them as downright dangerous.
For example, one of the most pernicious changes made to the original bill is a deadline placed on any Indiana community that might want to enact more enlightened smoking regulations than the state’s. If a local entity plans that sort of move — thereby joining such cities as West Lafayette, Bloomington, Fort Wayne and Greencastle — HB 1213 says it must be done by the end of this year.
One of the goals of a uniform workplace smoking ban was to make competition among bars, restaurants and casinos more fair. Rather than pit businesses that operate in a county or city with strong smoking prohibitions against businesses in nearby municipalities that have poor or no regulations, everyone would play by the same rules. Healthy rules.
But the opposite occurred as HB 1213 was whacked into impotence.
Some two dozen states already have banned smoking from all workplaces. Contrary to financial data from these trailblazers, Indiana restaurant, bar and casino owners insisted they would suffer great financial losses or be driven out of business by a real ban.
Meanwhile, cigarette-addicted citizens who refuse to admit that public smoking is a worker safety issue, joined in with their usual cry about Big Brother trying to run people’s lives.
Brad Klopfenstein, executive director of the Indiana Licensed Beverage Association, probably best summed up the anti-ban group view. In an Indianapolis Star story by Shari Rudavsky, Klopfenstein said of HR 1213, “We’d like to just see it go away and let the free market take care of things.”
That’s the free market that says, if you don’t want to expose yourself to cancer, emphysema and heart disease from second-hand smoke, then just don’t work in a bar, casino or restaurant that caters to adults in Indiana.
Groups such as Indiana Campaign for Smokefree Air now turn their attention to the Senate. Their best hope is for that chamber to restore in its version what was taken out of HR 1213. If that fails, the least the Senate can do is defeat a pretend public smoking ban that will only set back the fight to protect Hoosier workers.
Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com.
Opinion
STEPHANIE SALTER: The Indiana Legislature giveth, the Indiana Legislature taketh away
- Opinion
-
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Robins
I’m sure you know the American bird is the Bald Eagle and I’m sure you know it almost didn’t get that job.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 29, 2012
• ‘Laboring in a rut of Darwinism’
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Avoiding the heat no puzzle to Indy the dog
When it gets this hot, I’m with my eldest granddog, Indy. We both look for a room with a ceiling fan. She also demands that the room have a tile floor to cool both bottom and top. She has the floor of course, but there is a cool corner for me in a comfortable chair and a small table for my ice water.
-
EDITORIAL: Saluting his sacrifice
If you need a new reason to reflect upon the historic meaning of Memorial Day, let the ultimate sacrifice that Arronn D. Fields made a week ago today be your inspiration.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012
• Veterans, especially from WWII, deserve our lasting thanks
• All Bibles agree on ‘Golden Rule’
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you
Thank goodness, members of Congress do not drive in the Indianapolis 500.
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville
In the era of instant communication, the past seems to arrive much quicker.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Climbing the Ladder: 51 percent of the population in Indiana is female, and 31 of the 150
It was, utterly, one of the most painful political episodes I have ever had to watch as a political writer.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 27, 2012
• Alaska connection vital to Hoosiers who love wildlife
• Commissioners sell out Woodgate
• Same-sex marriage equalizes for all
• Mourdock can’t compromise on taxes
• Sweet lessons on ‘Lemonade Day’
• African Americans, slavery and Islam
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Confused
I am confused. For those who know me, that is not an unusual state. But, while listening to a political commercial on TV, I heard the announcer say the candidate was “real conservative.” If he is a “real conservative,” is someone not quite a “real conservative” an “unreal conservative”?
-
EDITORIAL: Towering response
It comes as incredibly sad news that a Garfield Towers resident has succumbed as the result of a fire last week at the northside apartment complex.
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
MARK BENNETT: 500 history runs in her veins, but she’ll pass on the buttermilk
Katy Balch appreciates tradition. The 20-year-old from Terre Haute understands how neatly her role as one of 33 Indianapolis 500 princesses fits her family.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: GSA Debacle
The recent General Services Administration debacle is enough to gag a whale.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
LIZ CIANCONE: She wasn’t hooked by the fishing hobby
I’m told that eveyone should have a hobby. If “hobby” means collecting something like stamps or coins, I don’t have one.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Cream of the crop
• Keep the ideas flowing
• Remembering fallen officers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
EDITORIAL: Hazards of the spring abundant now on I-70
A major holiday weekend is approaching. The weather has been consistently inviting for travel and outdoor activity. Gas prices are even inching downward.
-
MARK BENNETT: Roadway Role Models: Adults need to remember habits often rub off on teens
Plenty of dads connected with a car ad that first aired on TV two years ago.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
EDITORIAL: Embrace the Sycamores
Terre Haute should understand the rarity of an opportunity to celebrate a championship.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: ‘Political Super Pacs’
The Supreme Court has told us it is not constitutional to restrict how much money someone can put into a super political action committee.
-
EDITORIAL: Good choice for stability
For the first time in 25 years, Indiana will have a new chief justice for its Supreme Court. For those who value stability on the state’s highest court — and we count ourselves among those who do — the appointment Tuesday of longtime Justice Brent Dickson is good news.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
- More Opinion Headlines
-




