TERRE HAUTE — Until the past year, an august northern Indiana company, Zimmer Holdings, was pretty much going about business as usual: manufacturing a broad array of medical devices, such as hip and knee replacement implants, expanding operations in the United States and 25 nations, and racking up annual sales of nearly $4 billion.
Then Zimmer, with headquarters in Warsaw, got into some hot water with the federal government.
After a two-year investigation of the orthopedic implant industry, a criminal complaint was filed in U.S. District Court in New Jersey, where Zimmer does business. The complaint charged Zimmer and four other companies (two more from Warsaw) with “conspiracy to commit violations of the federal anti-kickback statute.”
Specifically, the feds said the companies provided what a U.S. attorney called “exorbitant” fees to doctors and other health-care consultants to exclusively choose, use or endorse their products for their patients.
Believe it or not, such practices are illegal in corporate America. Illegal, but not uncommon.
Four of the five companies, including Zimmer, were smacked with fines totaling about $311 million. All five agreed to an increasingly popular method of avoiding trial-and-punishment in federal court. The legal remedy is known as “deferred prosecution” and relies on an outside, independent “monitor” who oversees the compliance portion of the corporation’s effort to straighten up its act.
If the company pays its fine and fulfills the Justice Department’s demands for a year and a half, the charges are dismissed and the company need never admit wrongdoing.
None of this information would have oozed out of the rarefied world of federal court law, stock analysis or annual shareholder reports were it not for a disclosure that Zimmer did not have to make — but did — on its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The name of the monitor assigned to supervise Zimmer’s corporate integrity agreement for 18 months caught many an eye: Former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Yes, the fellow who served as the nation’s top lawyer during the Bush administration’s first term has done quite well for himself since resigning in February 2005. He now heads the Ashcroft Group, one of the most lucrative and popular Washington, D.C., consulting and lobbying firms in history.
Among his clients has been the Oracle Corp., which got a green light from the Justice Department for a huge acquisition only a few weeks after — what a coincidence — hiring Ashcroft in his very first year of business.
Depending on the workload, Ashcroft will charge Zimmer between $28 million and $52 million for monitoring services.
A spokesperson for Ashcroft’s firm told the New York Times that the monitorship involves some 30 people, has “taken a large personal commitment” from the former A.G., and already has required several trips to Indiana.
But even a potential $52-million haul for Ashcroft is not what brought deferred prosecutions to public — and Congressional — attention. Rather, it is the fact that Ashcroft got the no-bid, no-public-notice contract from someone who used to call him “boss.”
Christopher J. Christie has been a U.S. attorney in New Jersey since January 2002 when he left private practice and Republican fund raising for Ashcroft’s Justice Department. Two other monitors that Christie appointed for the other companies’ kick-back settlements were former Justice colleagues under Ashcroft who are now in private practice.
Since this information began to surface last autumn, all sorts of people have been educating themselves about deferred prosecution. What they have discovered is an increase in its use to save large corporations or individual executives from traditional trial and punishment, and a dearth of rules and regulations for awarding contracts to monitors.
A review of such settlements, conducted by lawyers in Texas, showed that the number of deferred or no-prosecution federal settlements has increased to 35 last year from five in 2003. Two-thirds of the cases involved corporate violations of either federal health-care laws or the Foreign Corruption Practices Act, the Texas study found.
Proponents of the Justice Department settlements argue that they are a way to punish and reform a company without killing it and costing thousands of employees their jobs.
“We will not use the power and authority of our office to destroy companies,” Christie told the Associated Press last September at a news conference announcing the settlements.
Looking at what Zimmer Holdings agreed to pay to avoid active prosecution provides an idea of just how much it would take to destroy a company of its size. Zimmer’s share of the four-company fine is $169.5 million. Ashcroft’s $28 million to $52 million is on top of that.
So far, the Zimmer case has resulted in several actions:
Pending legislation in New Jersey to set strict guidelines for deferred prosecution monitor appointments; an internal investigation by the Department of Justice; and Congressional investigations and hearings before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.
The current U.S. Attorney General, Michael Mukasey, was among those asked about the subject during testimony before the Senate committee late last month. Although deferred prosecutions got lost in a media hub-bub over Mukasey’s comments about the legality of waterboarding, the Bush Administration’s third attorney general said of the practice and its monitor contracts:
“Yes, we are looking at the phenomenon. Yes, we are going to see if there should be standards.”
Perhaps when John Ashcroft is finished monitoring the scene up in Warsaw, he would be happy to help his former Justice colleagues hammer out some standards. For a fee.
Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com.
Opinion
Stephanie Salter: What’s John Ashcroft doing in Indiana? Making millions
- Opinion
-
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Robins
I’m sure you know the American bird is the Bald Eagle and I’m sure you know it almost didn’t get that job.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 29, 2012
• ‘Laboring in a rut of Darwinism’
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Avoiding the heat no puzzle to Indy the dog
When it gets this hot, I’m with my eldest granddog, Indy. We both look for a room with a ceiling fan. She also demands that the room have a tile floor to cool both bottom and top. She has the floor of course, but there is a cool corner for me in a comfortable chair and a small table for my ice water.
-
EDITORIAL: Saluting his sacrifice
If you need a new reason to reflect upon the historic meaning of Memorial Day, let the ultimate sacrifice that Arronn D. Fields made a week ago today be your inspiration.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012
• Veterans, especially from WWII, deserve our lasting thanks
• All Bibles agree on ‘Golden Rule’
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you
Thank goodness, members of Congress do not drive in the Indianapolis 500.
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville
In the era of instant communication, the past seems to arrive much quicker.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Climbing the Ladder: 51 percent of the population in Indiana is female, and 31 of the 150
It was, utterly, one of the most painful political episodes I have ever had to watch as a political writer.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 27, 2012
• Alaska connection vital to Hoosiers who love wildlife
• Commissioners sell out Woodgate
• Same-sex marriage equalizes for all
• Mourdock can’t compromise on taxes
• Sweet lessons on ‘Lemonade Day’
• African Americans, slavery and Islam
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Confused
I am confused. For those who know me, that is not an unusual state. But, while listening to a political commercial on TV, I heard the announcer say the candidate was “real conservative.” If he is a “real conservative,” is someone not quite a “real conservative” an “unreal conservative”?
-
EDITORIAL: Towering response
It comes as incredibly sad news that a Garfield Towers resident has succumbed as the result of a fire last week at the northside apartment complex.
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
MARK BENNETT: 500 history runs in her veins, but she’ll pass on the buttermilk
Katy Balch appreciates tradition. The 20-year-old from Terre Haute understands how neatly her role as one of 33 Indianapolis 500 princesses fits her family.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: GSA Debacle
The recent General Services Administration debacle is enough to gag a whale.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
LIZ CIANCONE: She wasn’t hooked by the fishing hobby
I’m told that eveyone should have a hobby. If “hobby” means collecting something like stamps or coins, I don’t have one.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Cream of the crop
• Keep the ideas flowing
• Remembering fallen officers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
EDITORIAL: Hazards of the spring abundant now on I-70
A major holiday weekend is approaching. The weather has been consistently inviting for travel and outdoor activity. Gas prices are even inching downward.
-
MARK BENNETT: Roadway Role Models: Adults need to remember habits often rub off on teens
Plenty of dads connected with a car ad that first aired on TV two years ago.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
EDITORIAL: Embrace the Sycamores
Terre Haute should understand the rarity of an opportunity to celebrate a championship.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: ‘Political Super Pacs’
The Supreme Court has told us it is not constitutional to restrict how much money someone can put into a super political action committee.
-
EDITORIAL: Good choice for stability
For the first time in 25 years, Indiana will have a new chief justice for its Supreme Court. For those who value stability on the state’s highest court — and we count ourselves among those who do — the appointment Tuesday of longtime Justice Brent Dickson is good news.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
- More Opinion Headlines
-




