"Unless you have a complete meltdown, you’re going to get confirmed."
— Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor
Hmmm, let’s see. What could cause a 55-year-old Puerto Rican-American, who grew up in a Bronx housing project, lost her father in childhood, excelled in academics, graduated from Princeton University then Yale Law School, and was appointed to a federal appellate judgeship by the first President Bush, to have a complete meltdown during her Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court justice?
Could it be the sight and sound of several grown men — U.S. Senators, no less — continuing to take one sentence out of context from a speech the woman delivered eight years ago?
Apparently not. After more than two months of the always-amputated “wise Latina” quote being used against her by everyone from the talking heads of Fox News to the Republican National Committee, Sonia Sotomayor knows that nothing she or her supporters say will reunite that one sentence with the body of her speech.
By now, the repetition of those words must be so much white noise, like an old refrigerator that never stops running.
Perhaps a meltdown could be inspired by the supercilious and self-righteous questions, almost all from GOP Senators, as they pick and second-guess their way through some of the many cases on which Sotomayor has ruled in her 17 years on the federal bench.
After all, unlike the successful nominees of the second President Bush — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito — Sotomayor actually has a judicial record of some heft to examine. That it has been largely ignored (kind of like the rest of the “wise Latina” speech) in the long run-up to this week’s confirmation hearings could be enough to drive any serious person to distraction.
But, again, what else is new?
When Sotomayor’s name first surfaced as the Obama White House nominee, her opponents spent weeks publicly questioning her … personality. According to an endless media parade of “experts” and “analysts,” she was too crabby, too severe, too short with or dismissive of some lawyers who’d argued before her.
As one Florida attorney, who’d tried cases in front of her, opined in a Palm Beach newspaper, Sotomayor “lacked humility and equanimity” and was “inflated and antagonistic.”
If true — many other attorneys have publicly debunked the Mean Sonia charges — what was President Obama thinking? Heaven knows, when it comes to interpreting and defending the U.S. Constitution for the rest of your life, a cheerful smile and a warm demeanor are high on the list of requisite qualifications.
Just ask those sweet peas Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia.
Watching Sen. Orrin Hatch show off his legal chops Tuesday could have been especially irritating. He questioned (at stupefying length) Sotomayor’s rulings — and that of her U.S. 2nd District Court of Appeals colleagues — on Americans’ right to bear nunchucks, and on Ricci v. DeStefano, a firefighters promotion exam case.
After Sotomayor essentially told the 19-senator panel that the appellate court did in Ricci what appeals courts are supposed to do — rule on the soundness of the lower court ruling, which happened to run 78 pages — Hatch was not to be deterred. Solemnly, he wondered why she had relied on the lower court decision “rather than doing your own analysis of the issues.”
(Did someone say “activist judge”?)
Beyond that, Hatch’s other big point was that the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned Ricci. Had the Supremes voted anything but their familiar 5-4 in the case (the ninth Roberts Court overturn, by the way), the point might have been more impressive.
Some people could have reached the meltdown point early when several Senate Judiciary Committee members used Sotomayor’s appearance to re-open a couple of partisan wounds: for Republicans, the failed appeals court confirmation of Miguel Estrada; for Democrats, the successful Roberts nomination. (Dems now feel Roberts was less than honest in his promise of baseball-umpire neutrality.)
Some people might have snarled, “I thought this was my hearing.” But not Sotomayor — even when the partisan squabble came up again on the second day of questioning.
The judge’s real show of strength so far, however, probably came on Day One of the hearings. Amid the aforementioned Jets-and-Sharks fight over Estrada and Roberts, Sotomayor (and everyone else in the hearing room) got to sit for a mini-lecture from ranking Republican Jeff Sessions of Alabama.
Referring to the wise Latina fragment, Sessions said: “Call it empathy, call it prejudice, call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it’s not law. In truth, it’s more akin to politics — and politics has no place in the courtroom.”
As playwright Mart Crowley once put it: Talk about the pot calling the kettle beige.
Politics has no place in the courtroom? No doubt, all appointed federal judges and all nine justices, including the retired David Souter, would agree.
Politics is just what gets federal judges into the courtroom, thanks to partisan presidents and partisan confirmation committee members. And politics is what has turned this most recent Supreme Court confirmation process into a national referendum on a woman almost no ordinary American had ever heard of until May.
Significantly, Sotomayor did not dive across the table and grab Sessions by the throat. She didn’t even give him a withering reply that included the very different definitions of empathy, prejudice and sympathy.
At the end of Day Two, if her forged steel core was anywhere near meltdown, Sonia wasn’t showing it.
Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com.
Opinion
STEPHANIE SALTER: Senate judiciary hearings: See Sonia. See Sonia not sweat
- Opinion
-
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Robins
I’m sure you know the American bird is the Bald Eagle and I’m sure you know it almost didn’t get that job.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 29, 2012
• ‘Laboring in a rut of Darwinism’
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Avoiding the heat no puzzle to Indy the dog
When it gets this hot, I’m with my eldest granddog, Indy. We both look for a room with a ceiling fan. She also demands that the room have a tile floor to cool both bottom and top. She has the floor of course, but there is a cool corner for me in a comfortable chair and a small table for my ice water.
-
EDITORIAL: Saluting his sacrifice
If you need a new reason to reflect upon the historic meaning of Memorial Day, let the ultimate sacrifice that Arronn D. Fields made a week ago today be your inspiration.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012
• Veterans, especially from WWII, deserve our lasting thanks
• All Bibles agree on ‘Golden Rule’
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you
Thank goodness, members of Congress do not drive in the Indianapolis 500.
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville
In the era of instant communication, the past seems to arrive much quicker.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Climbing the Ladder: 51 percent of the population in Indiana is female, and 31 of the 150
It was, utterly, one of the most painful political episodes I have ever had to watch as a political writer.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 27, 2012
• Alaska connection vital to Hoosiers who love wildlife
• Commissioners sell out Woodgate
• Same-sex marriage equalizes for all
• Mourdock can’t compromise on taxes
• Sweet lessons on ‘Lemonade Day’
• African Americans, slavery and Islam
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: Confused
I am confused. For those who know me, that is not an unusual state. But, while listening to a political commercial on TV, I heard the announcer say the candidate was “real conservative.” If he is a “real conservative,” is someone not quite a “real conservative” an “unreal conservative”?
-
EDITORIAL: Towering response
It comes as incredibly sad news that a Garfield Towers resident has succumbed as the result of a fire last week at the northside apartment complex.
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
MARK BENNETT: 500 history runs in her veins, but she’ll pass on the buttermilk
Katy Balch appreciates tradition. The 20-year-old from Terre Haute understands how neatly her role as one of 33 Indianapolis 500 princesses fits her family.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: GSA Debacle
The recent General Services Administration debacle is enough to gag a whale.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
LIZ CIANCONE: She wasn’t hooked by the fishing hobby
I’m told that eveyone should have a hobby. If “hobby” means collecting something like stamps or coins, I don’t have one.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Cream of the crop
• Keep the ideas flowing
• Remembering fallen officers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
EDITORIAL: Hazards of the spring abundant now on I-70
A major holiday weekend is approaching. The weather has been consistently inviting for travel and outdoor activity. Gas prices are even inching downward.
-
MARK BENNETT: Roadway Role Models: Adults need to remember habits often rub off on teens
Plenty of dads connected with a car ad that first aired on TV two years ago.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
EDITORIAL: Embrace the Sycamores
Terre Haute should understand the rarity of an opportunity to celebrate a championship.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
RONN MOTT’S MINUTE: ‘Political Super Pacs’
The Supreme Court has told us it is not constitutional to restrict how much money someone can put into a super political action committee.
-
EDITORIAL: Good choice for stability
For the first time in 25 years, Indiana will have a new chief justice for its Supreme Court. For those who value stability on the state’s highest court — and we count ourselves among those who do — the appointment Tuesday of longtime Justice Brent Dickson is good news.
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
- More Opinion Headlines
-




