"Unless you have a complete meltdown, you’re going to get confirmed."
— Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor
Hmmm, let’s see. What could cause a 55-year-old Puerto Rican-American, who grew up in a Bronx housing project, lost her father in childhood, excelled in academics, graduated from Princeton University then Yale Law School, and was appointed to a federal appellate judgeship by the first President Bush, to have a complete meltdown during her Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court justice?
Could it be the sight and sound of several grown men — U.S. Senators, no less — continuing to take one sentence out of context from a speech the woman delivered eight years ago?
Apparently not. After more than two months of the always-amputated “wise Latina” quote being used against her by everyone from the talking heads of Fox News to the Republican National Committee, Sonia Sotomayor knows that nothing she or her supporters say will reunite that one sentence with the body of her speech.
By now, the repetition of those words must be so much white noise, like an old refrigerator that never stops running.
Perhaps a meltdown could be inspired by the supercilious and self-righteous questions, almost all from GOP Senators, as they pick and second-guess their way through some of the many cases on which Sotomayor has ruled in her 17 years on the federal bench.
After all, unlike the successful nominees of the second President Bush — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito — Sotomayor actually has a judicial record of some heft to examine. That it has been largely ignored (kind of like the rest of the “wise Latina” speech) in the long run-up to this week’s confirmation hearings could be enough to drive any serious person to distraction.
But, again, what else is new?
When Sotomayor’s name first surfaced as the Obama White House nominee, her opponents spent weeks publicly questioning her … personality. According to an endless media parade of “experts” and “analysts,” she was too crabby, too severe, too short with or dismissive of some lawyers who’d argued before her.
As one Florida attorney, who’d tried cases in front of her, opined in a Palm Beach newspaper, Sotomayor “lacked humility and equanimity” and was “inflated and antagonistic.”
If true — many other attorneys have publicly debunked the Mean Sonia charges — what was President Obama thinking? Heaven knows, when it comes to interpreting and defending the U.S. Constitution for the rest of your life, a cheerful smile and a warm demeanor are high on the list of requisite qualifications.
Just ask those sweet peas Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia.
Watching Sen. Orrin Hatch show off his legal chops Tuesday could have been especially irritating. He questioned (at stupefying length) Sotomayor’s rulings — and that of her U.S. 2nd District Court of Appeals colleagues — on Americans’ right to bear nunchucks, and on Ricci v. DeStefano, a firefighters promotion exam case.
After Sotomayor essentially told the 19-senator panel that the appellate court did in Ricci what appeals courts are supposed to do — rule on the soundness of the lower court ruling, which happened to run 78 pages — Hatch was not to be deterred. Solemnly, he wondered why she had relied on the lower court decision “rather than doing your own analysis of the issues.”
(Did someone say “activist judge”?)
Beyond that, Hatch’s other big point was that the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned Ricci. Had the Supremes voted anything but their familiar 5-4 in the case (the ninth Roberts Court overturn, by the way), the point might have been more impressive.
Some people could have reached the meltdown point early when several Senate Judiciary Committee members used Sotomayor’s appearance to re-open a couple of partisan wounds: for Republicans, the failed appeals court confirmation of Miguel Estrada; for Democrats, the successful Roberts nomination. (Dems now feel Roberts was less than honest in his promise of baseball-umpire neutrality.)
Some people might have snarled, “I thought this was my hearing.” But not Sotomayor — even when the partisan squabble came up again on the second day of questioning.
The judge’s real show of strength so far, however, probably came on Day One of the hearings. Amid the aforementioned Jets-and-Sharks fight over Estrada and Roberts, Sotomayor (and everyone else in the hearing room) got to sit for a mini-lecture from ranking Republican Jeff Sessions of Alabama.
Referring to the wise Latina fragment, Sessions said: “Call it empathy, call it prejudice, call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it’s not law. In truth, it’s more akin to politics — and politics has no place in the courtroom.”
As playwright Mart Crowley once put it: Talk about the pot calling the kettle beige.
Politics has no place in the courtroom? No doubt, all appointed federal judges and all nine justices, including the retired David Souter, would agree.
Politics is just what gets federal judges into the courtroom, thanks to partisan presidents and partisan confirmation committee members. And politics is what has turned this most recent Supreme Court confirmation process into a national referendum on a woman almost no ordinary American had ever heard of until May.
Significantly, Sotomayor did not dive across the table and grab Sessions by the throat. She didn’t even give him a withering reply that included the very different definitions of empathy, prejudice and sympathy.
At the end of Day Two, if her forged steel core was anywhere near meltdown, Sonia wasn’t showing it.
Stephanie Salter can be reached at (812) 231-4229 or stephanie.salter@tribstar.com.
Opinion
STEPHANIE SALTER: Senate judiciary hearings: See Sonia. See Sonia not sweat
- Opinion
-
-
MAX JONES: It is amazing what an energized downtown can do
For those of us who’ve watched the inspired growth and development of downtown Indianapolis through the years, it’s hard to understand sometimes the amazement some express at what’s been created.
-
MARK BENNETT: Proposed trail would give river development momentum, reacquaint community with Wabash
Terre Haute and the Wabash River were like strangers living next door to each other.
-
EDITORIAL: Drug-testing bill lacks fairness and decency
The current session of the Indiana Legislature has produced plenty of initiatives that play well to the majority party’s base.
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Why is Obama opening an Indiana office? Autos
On Thursday, the Obama for America campaign opened up a campaign office in Indiana, a state with a century-old love affair with the internal combustion engine.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 12, 2012
• White’s opponent entitled to office
• Positive moves for healthy foods
• Thanks from the Super Bowl XLVI Host Committee
• Doctor’s diet plan helps her arthritis
• Great support for fundraiser
• A few thoughts moving forward
-
FLASHPOINT: Graduation rates are up; great news for Indiana
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride.
-
READER'S FORUM: Feb. 11, 2012
• Controlling crows everyone’s job
• Strong plan needed to fight Alzheimer’s
-
EDITORIAL: Keep religion out of science class
An uncertain fate remains for an Indiana Senate bill that would, if it were to become law, allow public schools to teach creationism and other origin-of-life theories in their classes. But this fight may have already been grounded.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 10, 2012
• How about a parade for war veterans?
• Rubber reptiles will chase off crows
-
EDITORIAL: Delivering on infrastructure
With national, state and local economies showing distinct signs of recovery from the Great Recession of 2008, it is good to hear Mayor Duke Bennett sounding optimistic about Terre Haute and its immediate future.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 9, 2012
• Award proves art teacher’s special
• Technicality hits cancer patient
-
EDITORIAL: The shame of voter fraud
For a state that has supposedly spent so much time and effort passing and implementing strict laws concerning voter fraud, it certainly deserves the embarrassment being heaped on it for the Charlie White affair.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 8, 2012
• City engineer sets high standard
• More than paper to protect rights
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Give pets the gift of a better, longer life
It’s amazing how many of us at the Family Sports Center are involved with pets. But I recently became aware of how involved some of us have become.
-
Readers' Forum: Feb. 7, 2012
• Kodak moment for America?
• Let’s not bring back serfdom
• IU-Purdue game a nice diversion
-
EDITORIAL: Volunteer ‘army’ serving the needs of children
You know, of course, that casa means house. But do you also know that its all-capitals cousin, CASA, means home?
-
MARK BENNETT: Toxic victories
When the Super Bowl ends tonight in Indianapolis, most of the Giants and Patriots will shake hands, despite their competitive fire, win or lose.
-
EDITORIAL: Big dreams do come true
Consider this Super Bowl Sunday to be proof that anything is possible.
-
READERS FORUM: Feb. 5, 2012
• Why does Howey keep attacking Mourdock?
• Thanks for the commitment
• Accurate view of pipeline issue
• Oil pipeline is a pipe dream
• Not all workers belong to unions
• Unions protect working people
• Terre Haute Zoning issue unites neighbors
-
BRIAN HOWEY: Keeping Peyton in the Hoosier pantheon
When it comes to the pantheon of Hoosier sports heroes — Johnny Wooden, Knute Rockne, Bob Knight, Larry Bird, Reggie Miller, Rick Mount, Bobby Plump, George Gipp — the newest name will certainly be Peyton Manning.
-
FLASHPOINT: Tech trail leading us into a dense, digital forest
It seems the Southwest Parke schools are the latest to play the laptop lottery game.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 4, 2012
• Defending Bain, attacking Harrop, praising Romney
• Break a CFL? No reason to panic
• GOP’s timing not so super
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 3, 2012
• Keep pressure on the Pentagon
• Supportive words for Jim Mann
-
EDITORIAL: Big ‘kick’ from a native son
Every player in Sunday’s Super Bowl is from somewhere. But not every player remembers where he’s from and reaches out to consistently help those back home. Not like Steve Weatherford. Make that not like Terre Haute’s Steve Weatherford.
-
EDITORIAL: Smoking ban good enough
When it comes to getting things done in the Indiana General Assembly, progress is often measured in baby steps. Indeed, it can take years to achieve even meager accomplishments.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 2, 2012
• There are reasons unions are needed
• Why so hard to get a tow here?
-
EDITORIAL: United Way’s strong reputation helps sustain community trust
It would be foolish in any community to take “positives” for granted, but it’s easy to understand how a casual observer would assume that United Way of the Wabash Valley will always come through with flying colors.
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 1, 2012
• Better options for Deming Park area
• Tuskegee Airmen had local member
-
LIZ CIANCONE: Super Bowl festivities mostly for super rich
I hate being in a minority, but I guess I am. I am considerably less than thrilled over having the Super Bowl altogether too close to my back yard.
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 31, 2012
• Science from the heavens
• Unions exist to aid the worker
- More Opinion Headlines
-








