TERRE HAUTE — Thank goodness, hundreds of courageous Hoosiers and fellow Midwesterners now better understand how to respond to the unthinkable.
God help us if they have to.
Last week, more than 2,000 National Guard troops and nearly 1,000 civilian emergency workers completed an 11-day joint training exercise called “Vigilant Guard,” which launched in Terre Haute and then shifted to Muscatatuck in southern Indiana. A similar disaster preparedness exercise in Alaska this month is labeled “Northern Edge,” while another in New England, “Hurrex,” wrapped up last week too. Together, the three sessions comprise “Ardent Sentry,” a nationwide response test — the largest in Guard history — by the U.S. Northern Command.
There are no inspiring words to describe the premise for all of these difficult and necessary drills.
The simulated catastrophe in Vigilant Guard was the detonation of a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb near Indianapolis.
In the fictional scenario, as explained by National Guard Bureau spokesman Emanuel Pacheco, a “nondescript terrorist” drove a “vehicle-borne explosive” on Interstate 465 bound for downtown Indianapolis. But as he neared the junction with I-69, an Indiana State Police trooper noticed that vehicle (either a truck or a van) was weaving erratically. The trooper began tailing it. When the terrorist saw the cop, he detonated the bomb while driving.
The story line “was that he was headed to downtown Indianapolis,” Pacheco said by telephone from the command center at Muscatatuck, “and he just didn’t get that far.”
Despite being miles from his target, the heart of the city, the death toll in this imaginary interstate explosion was 14,000, with an additional 21,000 injuries and 300,000 refugees fleeing ravaged Indy. The responders heard reports of similar attacks in California, Alaska and Canada. The two real tragedies that prompted this month’s national training exercise — 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina — claimed a combined 4,800 lives. The scope of a nuclear strike such as this would surpass those two calamities in many horrific ways, from the radioactive fallout and related illnesses to the psychological trauma of its bleak aftermath.
The intent of the exercise was to intentionally push these response teams to their limits by throwing them multiple worst-case scenario curveballs.
To keep our sanity in the post-Hiroshima age, most of us consider the “worst-case” to also be the “least likely” possibility. But the leader of a group of scientists who monitor and assess global security through its well-known Doomsday Clock sees a nuclear attack becoming less and less unthinkable.
“These risks are hard to judge,” said Kennette Benedict, executive director of The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, an organization that has updated its Doomsday Clock every other month since 1947. “But many in the field who are military, former government officials and intelligence types say it’s not a matter of if, but when.”
Apparently, the danger is real enough to inspire the largest response training exercise in history.
Still poised to strike
The Doomsday Clock uses midnight as the moment when mass global destruction happens. In 1991, The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists set the clock at 17 minutes till midnight, its most relaxed position ever. Since then, the big hand has ominously crept toward 12. In January, it moved closer, from 7 minutes till midnight to 5 minutes from the Doomsday hour. It’s been closer only a few times, at 4 and 3 minutes till in 1981 and ’84, and 3 and 2 till in 1949 and ’53.
The nuclear pursuits of rogue governments in North Korea and Iran may seem to be the prime reason for the clock’s shift forward. And, indeed, the threats posed by those two countries added momentum, Benedict said. But an array of more clandestine potential sources for nuclear assaults are more plausible than hostile launches by Pyongyang or Tehran.
Even after years of dismantling their stashes, the two Cold War superpowers — the United States and Russia — still have a combined 26,000 nuclear weapons, according to The Bulletin. The rest of the world holds about 1,000 such weapons, and none of them are strike-ready, she said. By contrast, the U.S. and Russia have about 1,000 nukes apiece that are poised to launch toward each other at a moment’s notice, Benedict added, even though, in theory, the Cold War animosity disappeared when the Soviet Union crumbled in the 1980s.
The security of those primed weapons, as well as the uncertainty of Russia’s changing political intentions, present some of the gravest 21st-century concerns to the Doomsday Clock watchers. A terrorist group, for example, could tap into computers securing Russian nuclear weapons, without the Russians’ knowledge, sending ICBMs toward America.
“They are worried about somebody hacking into their system and launching intercontinental ballistic missiles,” Benedict said by phone from her office at the University of Chicago.
And what about the made-up plot in Vigilant Guard about the guy with a bomb in his van driving on I-465 toward Indy?
Suicidal terrorists linked to no particular nation have altered traditional efforts to prevent nuclear annihilation. Launch capability isn’t necessary. A “dirty bomb” — a weapon carrying radioactive material mixed with conventional explosives — could be delivered by a suicide bomber in an SUV. The materials needed could reach the U.S. through our porous shipping ports.
“We do think we are on the brink of a new nuclear age,” Benedict said.
‘Totally irrational’
Amid the flurry of sweat, effort and discovery by emergency responders trying to deal with such a diabolical nuclear strike, organizers of Vigilant Guard and Ardent Sentry also pondered ways to prevent that kind of attack. Their 11-day event included “a variety of tabletop exercises to basically go through a series of what-if scenarios,” said Pacheco, who came to Muscatatuck from the Guard’s Washington, D.C., base. “And all these lessons learned are incorporated into preventing this from happening.”
During the Cold War, the tit-for-tat buildup of nukes by the U.S. and U.S.S.R. (40,000 total) ironically became a deterrent for their use. That “mutually assured destruction” thing had a nasty ring to it in both Russian and English. The nuclear threat is no longer as simple as Us vs. Them, because “them” is a group that could be anywhere.
This is not a hopeless situation, though, Benedict insists. In 1984, when the Doomsday Clock stood at 3 minutes till nuclear midnight, few would’ve believed that by the end of that decade the Berlin Wall would fall and the Soviet Union would collapse.
“The world is full of surprises, and there are possibilities that could result in some pleasant surprises,” Benedict said. “Things can change. That’s the message here.”
Earlier this year, four veteran politicians from the most hawkish days of the Cold War called for the United States to aggressively reinvigorate and lead the drive toward “a world free of nuclear weapons.”
In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece co-written by former secretaries of state Henry Kissinger and George Schultz, former Defense Secretary William Perry and former U.S. Sen. Sam Nunn, that foursome acknowledged the evolving nuclear playing field. Yet they also outlined eight steps to address those changes, including changing the status of those 1,000 armed-and-ready nukes held by the U.S. and Russia, which are vulnerable to terrorist tampering and accidental launches, and better international control of weapons-grade materials.
They quoted John Kennedy saying, “The world was not meant to be a prison in which man awaits his execution,” and Ronald Reagan calling for the abolishment of all nuclear weapons because they are “totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for nothing but killing, possibly destructive of life on earth and civilization.”
We can argue about the nuclear track records of Kennedy, Reagan, Kissinger and the rest. But their conclusions are undeniably true, and it would be refreshing to see President Bush and other leaders speak and act as passionately about disarming the world as they do about waging war. When it comes to worst-case scenarios and the Doomsday Clock, it’s past time for a little peace.
Mark Bennett can be reached at mark.bennett@tribstar.com or (812) 231-4377.
Mark Bennett Opinion
Mark Bennett: While emergency teams prepare for nuclear disaster, Doomsday Clock watchers hope
- Mark Bennett Opinion
-
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you
Thank goodness, members of Congress do not drive in the Indianapolis 500.
-
MARK BENNETT: Roadway Role Models: Adults need to remember habits often rub off on teens
Plenty of dads connected with a car ad that first aired on TV two years ago.
-
MARK BENNETT: Farmers using no-till and cover crops doing their part to keep soil healthy
Earth Day typically features community cleanups, and discussions of air and water pollution. All deserve the attention.
-
MARK BENNETT: Lyrical legacy
Traditions begin, end, revive and evolve.
-
MARK BENNETT: GOP campaign fireworks could fizzle for Hoosiers once again
Of all the United States, Indiana deserves to experience Republican-on-Republican presidential attack-ad mania.
-
MARK BENNETT: Hard hit: Cash rewards for game-ending hits on NFL players are not a part of the game
The moaning and whining miss the point.
-
MARK BENNETT: Vigo County native helping relief agency provide physical, spiritual aid to Japan in wake of last year’s devastation
Help can be harder to receive than give.
-
MARK BENNETT: Perception of Wabash River’s water quality doesn’t always match reality
People like chocolate milk. In a glass. Fresh from the fridge.
-
MARK BENNETT: Filling a Need: Vigo County YMCA expected to open this spring
Comebacks inspire hope. They also require lots of work.
-
MARK BENNETT: Favorable images
Movie critics take a lot of criticism.
-
MARK BENNETT: Toxic victories
When the Super Bowl ends tonight in Indianapolis, most of the Giants and Patriots will shake hands, despite their competitive fire, win or lose.
-
MARK BENNETT: Indianapolis will be on display for the nation with the Super Bowl coming to town
Someone immersed in a crash diet to make a smashing impression at a class reunion may get the desired effect.
-
MARK BENNETT: Patiently waiting for Indiana's primary
While standing in a check-in line at Leonardo da Vinci Airport in Rome a few years ago, I watched an Italian woman walk past dozens of more patient travelers to grab a spot up front.
-
MARK BENNETT: Processing postal change
You probably know one of those 10,026.
-
MARK BENNETT: Multiple choice question: Voters must choose which direction they want the future of education to go
There was a time when few Hoosiers outside of education circles could name the state superintendent of public instruction.
-
MARK BENNETT: With an historic election behind Terre Haute, it’s time to look at the future’s possibilities
Everybody knows their “woulda, coulda, shoulda” moments.
-
MARK BENNETT: Economic forecast: Things looking up but don’t expect ‘much of a dent in unemployment’
Outside the Columbia Club, the atmosphere matched the picture of 2012 painted by a panel of economists for an audience of business people gathered inside that ritzy building on Monument Circle in Indianapolis.
-
MARK BENNETT: Students who reach for a college education too often are buried under a pile of debt
Right now, millions of college graduates are wondering whether their education was worth the effort.
That doubt hurts the country. -
MARK BENNETT: Tangier’s festival volunteers keep past alive for future
Traditions stay alive only as long as the people who hold them dear.
Small towns have that same life expectancy. -
MARK BENNETT: Made in the USA? A political T-shirt faux pas
The most rational statement about a small furor in the U.S. Senate campaign was uttered by a tea party organizer.
-
MARK BENNETT: Daniels goes where a candidate probably won’t in new book
Some things simply won’t get said on the political campaign trail.
-
MARK BENNETT: Time waits for no Manning
Sad, disappointed and uncertain. Colts fans feel all of those.
-
MARK BENNETT: Value of every minute deeply realized on 9/11 (related VIDEO)
Editor’s Note
This summer, the Tribune-Star’s Mark Bennett visited New York City, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., sites where the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, are now memorialized. He observed the cityscapes and landscapes forever changed by the events of that day and talked with people he encountered there, many of whom witnessed the attacks and their aftermath from close range and had personal ties to its victims. -
MARK BENNETT: As school begins, carve out daily time
By now, most back-to-school checklists are tattered and creased.
-
MARK BENNETT: Movie scene shows Terre Haute accepting Debs' role in its history
You stay classy, Terre Haute.
-
MARK BENNETT: Community outpouring represents collective sympathy for fallen officer
Every Terre Haute resident has probably been asked the same question.
“Why do you live there?” -
MARK BENNETT: Declaration of cursive’s death reminiscent of ’70s metric-conversion mania
When the state of Indiana announced it would no longer require schools to teach cursive handwriting, I was LOL.
-
MARK BENNETT: On Fourth of July, remember, too, those we depend on
A spatula in one hand, a cool beverage in the other, and a stash of bottle rockets in a plastic sack in the garage.
-
MARK BENNETT: Get out and see what the Valley has to offer
Maybe you drive the same route to work every day. Shortest route. Saves time and a few dimes worth of gas.
-
MARK BENNETT: Walking the fine bipartisan line
Lugar’s occasional departures from hard-line conservatism have put his six-term Senate position in jeopardy.
- More Mark Bennett Opinion Headlines
-
MARK BENNETT: Stuck in the middle with you




