News From Terre Haute, Indiana

Local & Bistate

November 19, 2008

Mayor maintains he did not violate Little Hatch Act in seeking office

TERRE HAUTE — Terre Haute Mayor Duke Bennett still believes he did not violate the Hatch Act when he ran for mayor last year despite findings by two Indiana courts that he did.

Bennett won the 2007 election by 110 votes over former Mayor Kevin Burke who then sued to have Bennett removed from office for violating the Little Hatch Act, a law that limits the political activity of people paid with federal funds.

Bennett worked as director of operations for the Hamilton Center when he ran for office in both 2003 and 2007. The Hamilton Center receives federal funding for its Head Start program.

Yet Bennett believes, given his role at the Hamilton Center and his connection to Head Start, the Hatch Act would not have applied to him. He also believes that only the U.S. Office of Special Council can make an official Hatch Act ruling.

“We’re still going to argue the point that I’m in violation of the Hatch Act. We still believe that’s an incorrect ruling,” Bennett said Wednesday afternoon in a media interview in his office. “I don’t agree with that.”

Bennett said he called the OSC in 2007 while he was running for mayor and made “general” inquiries about the Hatch Act. OSC officials told him the Hatch Act might apply to someone working for an organization such as Hamilton Center; however, “it’s based on the individual not just a blanket thing about the organization,” Bennett said.

“We looked at my role [at Hamilton Center] and everything I did and there was no reason to really pursue [questions about the Hatch Act] anymore,” he said.

In the initial legal challenge launched by Burke, Vigo County Superior Court Judge David Bolk ruled last December that Bennett was covered by the Hatch Act when he was a candidate for mayor; however, Bolk also found that Burke’s challenge came too late to prevent Bennett from assuming office.

Burke appealed Bolk’s decision allowing Bennett to take office and Bennett later appealed Bolk’s ruling that the Hatch Act applied to him.

Last week, the Indiana Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision found that the Hatch Act did apply to Bennett and called for a special election to fill the office of Terre Haute mayor.

In his media interview, Bennett also responded to comments Burke made Tuesday in a news conference at the former mayor’s home. Burke said Bennett had misled the public about the potential cost of a special election. Burke told reporters such an election would cost around $70,000. Bennett had put the cost between $300,000 and $580,000.

“That’s what it’s going to cost” to hold a special election, Bennett said Wednesday. He provided reporters with a bill, signed by Vigo County Auditor Jim Bramble, to the city of Terre Haute for $582,865 for expenses from the 2007 municipal elections. “It’s very expensive to run an election,” Bennett said.

In his news conference Tuesday, Burke said the $580,000 figure was for a “full-blown municipal election,” a primary and a recount. A 2004 special election in East Chicago cost $69,000, Burke said.

“I threw out the $300,000 [figure] because that’s what it’s going to cost,” Bennett said. One cannot compare Terre Haute election costs to those of another city because cities use different vendors for election services, he said. “I think [elections] are too expensive,” Bennett said, but “there is no misleading the public.”

Bennett also responded to Burke’s comment that Terre Haute’s federal funding could be in jeopardy because of his possible violation of the Hatch Act.

“That’s just political rhetoric,” Bennett said. Terre Haute faces no potential sanctions, he said. The Office of Special Council imposes sanctions against candidates and their employers in rare cases, Bennett said. When that happens, the sanctions do not “follow you around … There’s no way any action is going to be taken against Terre Haute,” he said. Bennett also said the OSC will not take his case now because he is no longer a candidate for office.

In his news conference Tuesday, Burke said someone found in violation of the Hatch Act can be barred from handling federal money for 18 months. “I saw the potential down the road for the city’s funding,” Burke said.

Bennett also used the opportunity Wednesday to defend his former employer, Hamilton Center. Burke said he chose not to make a public Hatch Act inquiry into Bennett’s eligibility before the 2007 election because the CEO of Hamilton Center assured him Bennett was not in violation of the Hatch Act.

“I think it’s unfortunate that Hamilton Center keeps getting drug into this,” Bennett said. “Based on the facts we [at Hamilton Center] had at the time, we didn’t believe there was any Hatch Act violation. I still don’t believe there was a Hatch Act violation.”

Bennett said his legal team is preparing its appeal of the appeals court ruling for the Indiana Supreme Court. He also said he will not pursue the case beyond Indiana’s highest court.

“We need to let the Supreme Court rule however it’s going to rule,” Bennett said. “I think it’s important we bring closure,” he said.

Bennett believes it is important for the Supreme Court to rule in this case in order to clarify who is and who isn’t covered under the Hatch Act in Indiana. Depending on how the court rules, we could see a lot more Hatch Act challenges to Indiana elections, he said. “You’re going to have more of these,” Bennett said.

There remains a lot of unanswered questions in the Burke v. Bennett case, including who would be eligible if a special election is ordered by the Supreme Court.

“However they rule, that’s going to be the final decision,” Bennett said. “There is enough grayness you really don’t know anything other than whatever the court ends up ruling,” he said.

Arthur Foulkes can be reached at (812) 231-4232 or arthur.foulkes@tribstar.com.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local & Bistate
Latest News
Multimedia

Like us on Facebook!
Community Calendar
Loading…
Events by eviesays.com
TribStar.com Poll
Join the Conversation
Helium
Front page
AP Video
Recording Superstar Whitney Houston Dead at 48 Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Palin Brings Anti-Washington Message to CPAC Maine GOP Chairman Says Romney Wins Caucuses Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate Fans 'Speechless' Over Houston's Death Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria Androgynous Model Walks Runway As Man and Woman US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany Snow Strands Italian Towns Latest Jason Wu Collection Shows Chinese Roots ShowBiz Minute: Madonna, Beresford-Redman, Pawsc Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords Raw Video: Rough Seas Stop Oil Removal 5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La. Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama Stars Show Support at AMFAR Charity Gala The Pits: Israelis Spit Olives for Glory Winter Slamming North Asia, Parts of Europe Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life
NDN Video
Recording Superstar Whitney Houston Dead at 48 Fans 'Speechless' Over Houston's Death Romney Tops Santorum in CPAC Straw Poll First glimpse of Blue Ivy Carter Absolute Lin-sanity Hate to be Rude: Bubba Watson Peek inside Barbie's closet Test on Comforter in Powell Unit Shows Blood Angry Dad Shoots Teens Laptop Hero Driver Saves Kids From Burning Bus Funeral to be held for Powell boys Sandusky on having to stay inside and people turning on him Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama Woolly Mammoth Caught on Camera? Did JLo 'Assault' Marc Anthony on Camera? Christie Brinkley's Runway Slip Toddler forced to run half-naked in snow Halle Wants to Leave the Country Northern Lights shine above earth Plane makes perfect belly landing
Parade
Magazine

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
  • -

    March 12, 2010

activity
Real Estate News