Sorting out vagaries of tax abatements
It’s not often that the Local and Bistate section has so many articles that are as interesting as last Wednesday’s paper (July 1). First, of course, was the article about the train at Deming Park. I thought it was very nice of them to ask people to donate the money, at least at first. It is always good when a part of government tries to ask for the money from citizens, instead of the usual method.
Then there was the Air Pollution folks who had their revenue cut off. They didn’t bother to ask for donations.
The real interesting story, though, was the one about abatements. If you didn’t get a chance to read it, you should. Howard Greninger’s story detailed that the Vigo County Council determined that the companies that received abatements were in compliance, even though they weren’t in compliance. I’ve always appreciated the exact and specific nature of tax abatement language, but I digress.
The story then went on to clearly state, at least for three companies cited in the article, that each of them was not at all in compliance with the “specific conditions of future numbers of jobs and salaries”, agreed to in their statements contained in their respective abatements.
How can those “specific conditions” be both true and false at the same time? Now there’s a question citizens of Vigo County deserve an answer to.
The answer is that those “specific conditions” aren’t specific at all. That’s the magic of economic development language. It sounds seriously meaningful when in reality it is completely and totally meaningless. When something can mean anything, it can, and does, usually mean nothing at all.
If you are a property taxpayer, you should think about that in the next few weeks when you get your property tax bill. You might want to give your council member a call when you do.
— Ryan Cummins
Terre Haute
Letters
Readers' Forum: July 5, 2009
- Letters
-
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012
• Veterans, especially from WWII, deserve our lasting thanks
• All Bibles agree on ‘Golden Rule’
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 27, 2012
• Alaska connection vital to Hoosiers who love wildlife
• Commissioners sell out Woodgate
• Same-sex marriage equalizes for all
• Mourdock can’t compromise on taxes
• Sweet lessons on ‘Lemonade Day’
• African Americans, slavery and Islam
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 16, 2012
• Assessing the tough decisions
• Take another look at school schedule
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 15, 2012
• Attack obesity at its causes
• Uplifting service for believers
• Evolution based on faith, not proof
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 14, 2012
• Liberals distort women’s issues
• Davis Park says thanks for honor
-
READERS' FORUM: May 13, 2012
• Right answer is respect, inclusion
• Theme sounds strangely familiar
• Good explanation, still no solution
• Facts about our founders
• Santorum and the Constitution
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 12, 2012
Don’t be afraid to seek help
Thanks to young man for honesty
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 11, 2012
• Loving your mom life-long devotion
• Opinions should be based on facts
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 10, 2012
• Open your hearts to moms Sunday
• How can we be proud of this?
-
READERS' FORUM: MAY 9, 2012
• Too much info in missing child case
• Motorists throw trash along road
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 8, 2012
• Job well done on highway problem
• THN squads excel at high level
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 7, 2012
• Let’s protect the unborn as well
• Animal ordinance handled responsibly
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 6, 2012
• Nothing militant about tea party
• Resources abound to prevent child abuse
• IDOE chasing red flag of bias
• Ping gives voice to all voters
• Charity auction set for June 30
• Great support for meeting
-
READERS' FORUM: May 5, 2012
• Candidate would be team builder
• New event for local golfers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 4, 2012
• Romney speech truly inspiring
• Students get a dose of reality
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 3, 2012
• Stand against fed harassers
• GOP’s war on women is real
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 2, 2012
• Bryan an asset to County Coun
• Gravity proven, evolution is not
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 1, 2012
Community steps up to tee again
Foolish comment missed its mark
Newest enemy worse than all
-
READERS FORUM: April 30, 2012
• Moving toward sustainability
-
READERS’ FORUM: April 29, 2012
• Column highlights crucial document
• Trash bins still an ugly problem
• Incumbents have earned re-election
• On energy, Lugar has been leader
• Understanding law and theory
• Special day at Riley school
• A busy time at Franklin school
-
READERS’ FORUM: Apr. 28, 2012
• Seeking help to make our city better
• Club style show a major success
• Sen. Lugar is a serious leader
-
READERS’ FORUM: April 27, 2012
• Lugar initiatives helped the Valley
• Theory, law not the same
• Retire Sen. Lugar and Rep. Bucshon
• In government, less can be more
- More Letters Headlines
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 28, 2012




