Sorting out vagaries of tax abatements
It’s not often that the Local and Bistate section has so many articles that are as interesting as last Wednesday’s paper (July 1). First, of course, was the article about the train at Deming Park. I thought it was very nice of them to ask people to donate the money, at least at first. It is always good when a part of government tries to ask for the money from citizens, instead of the usual method.
Then there was the Air Pollution folks who had their revenue cut off. They didn’t bother to ask for donations.
The real interesting story, though, was the one about abatements. If you didn’t get a chance to read it, you should. Howard Greninger’s story detailed that the Vigo County Council determined that the companies that received abatements were in compliance, even though they weren’t in compliance. I’ve always appreciated the exact and specific nature of tax abatement language, but I digress.
The story then went on to clearly state, at least for three companies cited in the article, that each of them was not at all in compliance with the “specific conditions of future numbers of jobs and salaries”, agreed to in their statements contained in their respective abatements.
How can those “specific conditions” be both true and false at the same time? Now there’s a question citizens of Vigo County deserve an answer to.
The answer is that those “specific conditions” aren’t specific at all. That’s the magic of economic development language. It sounds seriously meaningful when in reality it is completely and totally meaningless. When something can mean anything, it can, and does, usually mean nothing at all.
If you are a property taxpayer, you should think about that in the next few weeks when you get your property tax bill. You might want to give your council member a call when you do.
— Ryan Cummins
Terre Haute
Letters
Readers' Forum: July 5, 2009
- Letters
-
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 12, 2012
• White’s opponent entitled to office
• Positive moves for healthy foods
• Thanks from the Super Bowl XLVI Host Committee
• Doctor’s diet plan helps her arthritis
• Great support for fundraiser
• A few thoughts moving forward
-
READER'S FORUM: Feb. 11, 2012
• Controlling crows everyone’s job
• Strong plan needed to fight Alzheimer’s
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 10, 2012
• How about a parade for war veterans?
• Rubber reptiles will chase off crows
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 9, 2012
• Award proves art teacher’s special
• Technicality hits cancer patient
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 8, 2012
• City engineer sets high standard
• More than paper to protect rights
-
Readers' Forum: Feb. 7, 2012
• Kodak moment for America?
• Let’s not bring back serfdom
• IU-Purdue game a nice diversion
-
READERS FORUM: Feb. 5, 2012
• Why does Howey keep attacking Mourdock?
• Thanks for the commitment
• Accurate view of pipeline issue
• Oil pipeline is a pipe dream
• Not all workers belong to unions
• Unions protect working people
• Terre Haute Zoning issue unites neighbors
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 4, 2012
• Defending Bain, attacking Harrop, praising Romney
• Break a CFL? No reason to panic
• GOP’s timing not so super
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 3, 2012
• Keep pressure on the Pentagon
• Supportive words for Jim Mann
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 2, 2012
• There are reasons unions are needed
• Why so hard to get a tow here?
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 1, 2012
• Better options for Deming Park area
• Tuskegee Airmen had local member
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 31, 2012
• Science from the heavens
• Unions exist to aid the worker
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 30, 2012
• Right-to-work bill hurts state’s workers
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 29, 2012
• Obama wrong on recess appointments
• Thanks for honoring ‘Soup’ at his passing
• Mercury more danger than coal emission?
• Beware employers who cut corners
• All beliefs need to be respected
• People’s decency becomes evident
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 28, 2012
• Don’t muzzle North’s ‘Woelf Pack’
• The true legacy of coach Paterno
• Bullet holes suggest dangerous gun use
• Union coercion in right-to-work issue
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 27, 2012
• Labor bill would divide unions
• GOP sure to retain Statehouse control
• Internet lies about liberalism and more
• National debt backs job growth numbers
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 26, 2012
• Right-to-work law wrong for workers
• Put labor law on the ballot
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 24, 2012
• Super Bowl raises parking, gas prices
• Obama should OK energy job issue
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 23, 2012
• Keystone pipeline is needed now
• Great seasons for South Vigo sports
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 22, 2012
• Distorted view of mine’s practices
• Planning is necessary to ensure free market
• Bring back one-class tourney
• Wonderful book for a great cause
• Liberals no longer hold moral ground
• Another great holiday tourney
• A few things to think about
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 21, 2012
• Protect our kids from mercury
• Older drivers have safety opportunity
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 20, 2012
• Workers should pay fair share
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 19, 2012
• Two sides to labor issue
• Learn more about right-to-work law
-
READERS’ FORUM: Jan. 18, 2012
• Facts show labor bill is bad idea
• Rural road needs more attention
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 17, 2012
• Embracing those liberal definitions
• People responded to help after mishap
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 15, 2012
• Breaking unions and middle class
• Union dues have favorable results
• Labor law hasn’t hurt fed workers
• Labor bill mean and destructive
• Indiana’s friendly business confines
• Ideal spot for new housing
• Americans need some motivation
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 14, 2011
• Solutions lie in compromise
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 13, 2012
• Great stories to warm your heart
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 12, 2012
Interference? No.
Opportunity? Yes -
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 12, 2012
• Interference? No. Opportunity? Yes
- More Letters Headlines
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 12, 2012








