‘Reasoned dialogue’ or ‘tortured logic’
This letter is a final response to the letter of Raymond Broshar, June 23, 2009. It will be my final response to your writings, sir, because it has become clear to me that you believe only your comments are “informed” and that only your dialogue is “reasoned.”
Why do any further rebutting if I am so hopelessly outclassed? Based on what I have observed of your “reasoned dialogue” thus far, however, I have decided that you would not recognize “reasoned dialogue” if it jumped up and bit you on the backside.
You are a master, however, of composing bombastic, sweeping, pompous, doomsday generalizations which you do not support with evidence. Why do you not avail yourself of the opportunity to give precise, hard, clear examples of the freedoms you think we are losing so disastrously? You were the one who listed only failed government programs. A person of “reasoned dialogue” would have conceded that there are many working, effective government programs helping millions. The onus is not on me to list them — as a man of “reasoned dialogue,” you have that responsibility.
A man of “reasoned dialogue” would not label a man he has probably never met “one of the most hateful persons in the country.” A man of “reasoned dialogue” would not try to persuade a newspaper to stop publishing cartoons he disagrees with and then claim that he does not “wish to censor persons”. A man of “reasoned dialogue” would not write, “I am not personally attacking Mr. Hackleman” after writing, “When the Hacklemans of this world are willing to completely surrender their freedoms to the masters in Washington we will have seen our Great Experiment die.” If I were Mr. Hackleman, I would definitely feel “personally attacked.” But maybe I am just overly sensitive.
A man of “reasoned dialogue” would look up a big word before using it incorrectly. I did not “ostracize” you for your broadsides to Lew Hackleman. A man of “reasoned dialogue” would not try to draw an analogy between a newspaper putting a cartoon on an editorial page and a drunk puking in the middle of a “gathering place.” A man of “reasoned dialogue” would not categorize Mr. Toles with the Unabomber. Or am I just so uninformed and lacking in reason that I have misconstrued the tortured logic in paragraphs two and three of your latest letter?
Anyway, continue to reward us with your “reasoned dialogue.” This “uninformed” reader has read (and responded to) his last Broshar letter. I have had all the “reasoned dialogue” I can stomach for a while.
— Randall B. Allen
Brazil
Vigo County jail a sour facility
Some people buy a car only to find out they have a lemon. They keep pumping money into it making repairs, only to discover another problem has come up.
The taxpayers of Vigo County have their own lemon called the Security Center. More money has been pumped into this building than the building is probably worth. Most repairs generally run over $50,000 and now they have to do something about the ceiling to keep the prisoners from trying to escape.
Let’s face it, it was poor planning on the part of those who decided to build a new jail. This building is in a poor location — the only way it can grow is up. The last addition to the jail was way over a million dollars. Still we have to send prisoners to other county jails because we don’t have the room to hold them.
This means more of the taxpayers’ money. Perhaps the county commissioners should look for another place to build the next jail, maybe in the industrial park. Vigo county owns a lot of land down there. In the meantime, I guess the taxpayers will have to continue to pay for the lemon at Third and Wabash.
— Fred Roberts
Terre Haute
Letters
Readers' Forum: June 29, 2009
- Letters
-
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 12, 2012
• White’s opponent entitled to office
• Positive moves for healthy foods
• Thanks from the Super Bowl XLVI Host Committee
• Doctor’s diet plan helps her arthritis
• Great support for fundraiser
• A few thoughts moving forward
-
READER'S FORUM: Feb. 11, 2012
• Controlling crows everyone’s job
• Strong plan needed to fight Alzheimer’s
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 10, 2012
• How about a parade for war veterans?
• Rubber reptiles will chase off crows
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 9, 2012
• Award proves art teacher’s special
• Technicality hits cancer patient
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 8, 2012
• City engineer sets high standard
• More than paper to protect rights
-
Readers' Forum: Feb. 7, 2012
• Kodak moment for America?
• Let’s not bring back serfdom
• IU-Purdue game a nice diversion
-
READERS FORUM: Feb. 5, 2012
• Why does Howey keep attacking Mourdock?
• Thanks for the commitment
• Accurate view of pipeline issue
• Oil pipeline is a pipe dream
• Not all workers belong to unions
• Unions protect working people
• Terre Haute Zoning issue unites neighbors
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 4, 2012
• Defending Bain, attacking Harrop, praising Romney
• Break a CFL? No reason to panic
• GOP’s timing not so super
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 3, 2012
• Keep pressure on the Pentagon
• Supportive words for Jim Mann
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 2, 2012
• There are reasons unions are needed
• Why so hard to get a tow here?
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 1, 2012
• Better options for Deming Park area
• Tuskegee Airmen had local member
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 31, 2012
• Science from the heavens
• Unions exist to aid the worker
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 30, 2012
• Right-to-work bill hurts state’s workers
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 29, 2012
• Obama wrong on recess appointments
• Thanks for honoring ‘Soup’ at his passing
• Mercury more danger than coal emission?
• Beware employers who cut corners
• All beliefs need to be respected
• People’s decency becomes evident
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 28, 2012
• Don’t muzzle North’s ‘Woelf Pack’
• The true legacy of coach Paterno
• Bullet holes suggest dangerous gun use
• Union coercion in right-to-work issue
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 27, 2012
• Labor bill would divide unions
• GOP sure to retain Statehouse control
• Internet lies about liberalism and more
• National debt backs job growth numbers
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 26, 2012
• Right-to-work law wrong for workers
• Put labor law on the ballot
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 24, 2012
• Super Bowl raises parking, gas prices
• Obama should OK energy job issue
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 23, 2012
• Keystone pipeline is needed now
• Great seasons for South Vigo sports
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 22, 2012
• Distorted view of mine’s practices
• Planning is necessary to ensure free market
• Bring back one-class tourney
• Wonderful book for a great cause
• Liberals no longer hold moral ground
• Another great holiday tourney
• A few things to think about
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 21, 2012
• Protect our kids from mercury
• Older drivers have safety opportunity
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 20, 2012
• Workers should pay fair share
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 19, 2012
• Two sides to labor issue
• Learn more about right-to-work law
-
READERS’ FORUM: Jan. 18, 2012
• Facts show labor bill is bad idea
• Rural road needs more attention
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 17, 2012
• Embracing those liberal definitions
• People responded to help after mishap
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 15, 2012
• Breaking unions and middle class
• Union dues have favorable results
• Labor law hasn’t hurt fed workers
• Labor bill mean and destructive
• Indiana’s friendly business confines
• Ideal spot for new housing
• Americans need some motivation
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 14, 2011
• Solutions lie in compromise
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 13, 2012
• Great stories to warm your heart
-
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 12, 2012
Interference? No.
Opportunity? Yes -
READERS' FORUM: Jan. 12, 2012
• Interference? No. Opportunity? Yes
- More Letters Headlines
-
READERS' FORUM: Feb. 12, 2012








