Prosecutor: Woman broke law, case handled correctly
Your editorial of Sept. 6 contains a substantive error. Ms. [Sally] Harpold did not pay a $300 bond plus a $218 deferral fee. Her deferral fee was deducted from her bond money and then the remainder of her bond money (minus the Clerk’s administrative fee of $30) was returned to her. So, since it appears from your editorial that you are soliciting for someone to reimburse Ms. Harpold the costs for her having violated the law, then you will need to advise whoever that might be that the cost was $248, not $518.
I have read your editorial several times, and I have honestly asked myself whether I treated Ms. Harpold unfairly in the handling of her case, and I still think that this case was prosecuted and resolved in an appropriate manner. Even you begin your analysis with the premise that strict enforcement of the drug laws is necessary so that your county (Vigo) and mine (Vermillion) do not experience the same kind of meth epidemic that we did just a few years ago. Surely it is not necessary to remind you or anyone else of the incredible negative impact that methamphetamine abuse had on the Wabash Valley … the destructive toll of this drug was enormous. The law which was applied in this case has had a great impact on the ability of “meth cookers” to get their primary ingredient, i.e. ephedrine or pseudoephedrine. And, as a result of this law, meth production and meth use has been substantially curtailed in both of our counties as well as all across the State of Indiana. Law enforcement officials, primarily Jon Marvel, the Vigo County Sheriff, fought long and hard for the passage of this law. In fact, if memory serves me correctly, Vigo County had an ordinance in effect regarding the purchase of ephedrine long before the state legislators passed the current law. So I do not know how anyone can analyze this law and not conclude that it is a good law because it has had the desired effect, i.e. a reduction in meth manufacturing and meth use.
The law, of course, does not require that the State show that the purchaser intended to make meth. And, the truth of the matter, is that many of the people who violate the “purchase law” are not meth makers. Oftentimes, they are people on limited income who are simply induced to purchase the product because a $4 box of cold medicine can be resold for $30 to $50 to a meth maker. I am sure that there are a myriad of reasons why people violate the law, but a person’s reason or motive is seldom an element of a crime. Obviously, the reason that Ms. Harpold is upset and presumably the reason that your editorial criticizes my handling of the case is that there was no evidence that Ms. Harpold intended to make meth. However, the law does not require such an intent, and truthfully, the law would be completely ineffective if such an intent were required.
I do agree with you that it would be helpful if there were very noticeable signs posted at each pharmacy which stated the restrictions imposed by the law. However, if you study the history of the many attempts by law enforcement to control the sale of ephedrine (especially the product Sudafed) you will find that the pharmaceutical companies fought long and hard against any restrictions on these products. It is very difficult to get an industry which is in the business of selling a product for a profit to do anything which adversely affects the number of sales.
Lastly, if presented with these same facts again, I would handle the case exactly the same way. Ms. Harpold violated the law, and because she had no prior criminal history, I offered her the most lenient resolution at my disposal which is a pre-trial deferral agreement. I am assuming that she will comply with the terms of that agreement, and at the expiration of the appropriate time period I will dismiss the case against her. And, even though you disagree with my handling of this case, the public should know that our law enforcement officers review the pharmacy records approximately every 45-60 days, and I will continue to prosecute anyone who violates this law.
— Nina J. Alexander
Vermillion County Prosecutor
Obama, Dems demonizing medical profession
The exalted one is a bald-faced liar. The one who causes tingles to run up Chris Mathews’ leg when he speaks made deliberately false statements in New Hampshire last month regarding surgeon’s fees for amputations. Obama said family physicians collect “a pittance” for helping diabetic patients lose weight, watch their diets, and monitor their medications, whereas surgeons collect “$30,000, $40,000, $50,000” for an amputation of a diabetic foot.
This is a patent, despicable and gross attempt by the Democrats to demonize the medical profession in their march to socialize our Health care system and our country. Medicare reimbursements for amputations range from $700 to $1200, depending on the level of amputation. This fee includes 90 days follow up care after surgery. Most private insurance companies base their reimbursements on Medicare fees.
Mr. Obama, “the one we’ve been waiting for,” made another vile misrepresentation about doctors a few weeks earlier — that they would rather “yank out” kids’ tonsils than treat sore throats because it pays more.
As a practicing surgeon, I am outraged that this “community organizer” suggests that we casually amputate body parts for big bucks. The decision to perform an amputation comes only after a long, deliberate, non-operative process which always includes the patient’s family doctor, several specialists and the surgeon.
If one extrapolates the level of blatant dishonesty regarding surgical fees to the rest of Obama’s rhetoric, one can only be very frightened for our country’s future. Remember this guy grew up in Chicago politics and never ran anything as complicated as a Dairy Queen.
— Robert R. Taube,
M.D., F.A.C.S.
Terre Haute
Letters
Readers' Forum: Sept. 11, 2009
- Letters
-
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012
• Mayor, Republic solve trash issue
• Negative ads pervert politics
• VCSC team gives all-star response
-
READERS' FORUM: May 24, 2012
• Cartoon unfunny, insults disabled
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 23, 2012
• The rule of the ‘government czar’
• Promises often don’t prove noble
• Smoking not going away soon
• Primary voting gets it wrong
• Where’s the pride in our parks?
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 22, 2012
• Try a new approach to control drugs
• Our president is ruining the USA
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 21, 2012
• Some still don’t understand presence of pervasive racism
• Thanks for help in emergency
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 20, 2012
St. Ann’s gives thanks to those who supported its mission
No deception, just GOP spin
Disdain for only liberals
Writer doesn’t know the Bible
Flawed primary discourages voters
Recognition was much appreciated
Who’s fanning marriage issue?
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 18, 2012
• Romney imperfect, but better option
• Great support for Strassenfest
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 17, 2012
• Don’t ignore what GOP won’t tell you
• Scotties help keep neighborhood tidy
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 16, 2012
• Assessing the tough decisions
• Take another look at school schedule
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 15, 2012
• Attack obesity at its causes
• Uplifting service for believers
• Evolution based on faith, not proof
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 14, 2012
• Liberals distort women’s issues
• Davis Park says thanks for honor
-
READERS' FORUM: May 13, 2012
• Right answer is respect, inclusion
• Theme sounds strangely familiar
• Good explanation, still no solution
• Facts about our founders
• Santorum and the Constitution
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 12, 2012
Don’t be afraid to seek help
Thanks to young man for honesty
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 11, 2012
• Loving your mom life-long devotion
• Opinions should be based on facts
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 10, 2012
• Open your hearts to moms Sunday
• How can we be proud of this?
-
READERS' FORUM: MAY 9, 2012
• Too much info in missing child case
• Motorists throw trash along road
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 8, 2012
• Job well done on highway problem
• THN squads excel at high level
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 7, 2012
• Let’s protect the unborn as well
• Animal ordinance handled responsibly
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 6, 2012
• Nothing militant about tea party
• Resources abound to prevent child abuse
• IDOE chasing red flag of bias
• Ping gives voice to all voters
• Charity auction set for June 30
• Great support for meeting
-
READERS' FORUM: May 5, 2012
• Candidate would be team builder
• New event for local golfers
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 4, 2012
• Romney speech truly inspiring
• Students get a dose of reality
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 3, 2012
• Stand against fed harassers
• GOP’s war on women is real
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 2, 2012
• Bryan an asset to County Coun
• Gravity proven, evolution is not
-
READERS’ FORUM: May 1, 2012
Community steps up to tee again
Foolish comment missed its mark
Newest enemy worse than all
-
READERS FORUM: April 30, 2012
• Moving toward sustainability
-
READERS’ FORUM: April 29, 2012
• Column highlights crucial document
• Trash bins still an ugly problem
• Incumbents have earned re-election
• On energy, Lugar has been leader
• Understanding law and theory
• Special day at Riley school
• A busy time at Franklin school
-
READERS’ FORUM: Apr. 28, 2012
• Seeking help to make our city better
• Club style show a major success
• Sen. Lugar is a serious leader
-
READERS’ FORUM: April 27, 2012
• Lugar initiatives helped the Valley
• Theory, law not the same
• Retire Sen. Lugar and Rep. Bucshon
• In government, less can be more
-
READERS' FORUM: Rose-Hulman’s work to become ‘great’ presses on
The Rose-Hulman Board of Trustees shares the deep sense of loss at the passing of President Matt Branam.
-
READERS FORUM: April 25, 2012
• Science doesn’t destroy faith in Scriptures • Burger deserves voter support
- More Letters Headlines
-
READERS' FORUM: May 25, 2012




