Letters

Search Results

Close Previous Now showing: of Next

Previous Next Close

Discussion

Welcome to our online comments feature. We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean. We reserve the right to remove comments that are obscene, racist or abusive and statements that are false or unverifiable as well as posts that are attacking other users. Repeat offenders will be blocked. You may flag objectionable comments for review by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus

March 13, 2010

FLASHPOINT: ISU faculty have every right to complain about ISU’s plans

Anonymous Special to the Tribune-Star The Tribune Star Sat Mar 13, 2010, 10:54 PM EST

TERRE HAUTE — In its lead editorial of March 10, the Tribune-Star suggests that ISU faculty resist the urge to complain publicly about the potential impact of state budget cuts to higher education. As a tenured professor at ISU, I take issue with an argument that is built on two highly dubious presumptions: one, that most faculty are somehow out of touch with the impact of the Great Recession on the general workforce; and, two, that faculty complaints have been motivated by self-serving opposition to cuts to sabbaticals and “valuable research time.”

The first presumption is simply false. University faculty members do not live in a bubble; we all have friends, family, and colleagues who are struggling to survive in the current economic environment. Moreover, despite our “great health care and retirement benefits”, a phrase from the editorial which deserves more critical attention than I can give here, most faculty at ISU have been working hard to provide quality higher education to our students despite a level of compensation that has remained stubbornly lower than that of our peer institutions for years.

In fact, a high priority for the Bradley administration before the current budget crisis was addressing below-average faculty salaries at ISU, a state of affairs that the faculty have had to “suck up” semester after semester, without prodding from the Tribune-Star.

The second presumption, while also false, is more disturbing, because it only encourages the sense that “town and gown” or, if you prefer, the Ivory Tower and the Real World have differing and incompatible priorities. The Tribune-Star editorial implies that sabbaticals and research time are luxuries, while ignoring the fact that university professors are, at one level, professional researchers, whose personal work produces the critical advances in science, technology, medicine, and, yes, the liberal arts, that allow our society to continue to advance.

More important, the editorial completely misses the connection between research and instruction, something that the ISU Mission Statement emphasizes: Indiana State University combines a tradition of strong undergraduate and graduate education with a focus on community and public service. We integrate teaching, research, and creative activity in an engaging, challenging, and supportive learning environment to prepare productive citizens for Indiana and the world.

The ISU faculty has every right to complain publicly and privately about administration proposals that affect the university. We have already witnessed severe cuts to staff and adjunct faculty that will have a negative impact on instruction for the foreseeable future. Before asking the ISU faculty to grin and bear additional, unilateral administrative “solutions” to the budget crisis, the Tribune-Star should be helping to illuminate the difficult choices now facing the entire ISU community.

If, for example, teaching loads rise dramatically, research will suffer, which will threaten graduate programs and the quality of undergraduate teaching; class sizes will increase, which will undermine the learning environment; community and public service will be diluted, which will put into question the distinctiveness of the ISU brand.

ISU students, their families, and anyone concerned about the state of higher education in Indiana, including, presumably, the Tribune-Star, should also be willing to raise questions and complain, if necessary, about this potential transformation. Where does the ISU community stand on some of these proposals? Is access to a research-intensive university a luxury or a necessity for ISU students? Will they tolerate larger classes? Are they willing they take courses from faculty who are forced to teach outside their disciplines? Should the administration shoulder proportionate cuts to its budget? Should it be required to seek faculty input? How much money should be spent on athletics at an academic institution facing severe budget pressures? Does this community value education enough to petition state government to sustain higher education funding within the current budget — or to raise taxes to a level that would protect educational priorities in the face of declining revenues? 

Or, in the end, should ISU students and families also “suck it up” and continue to patronize (and pay tuition to) a university that finds it harder and harder to comply with its stated mission?

— Timothy Hawkins, Ph.D.

Associate Professor

Department of History

Indiana State University

Terre Haute

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Letters

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 14, 2012

  • Free us from 'Republicanism'

  • Eagles take pride in group’s work

  • Be careful what you strive for

   

  February 14, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 12, 2012

  • White’s opponent entitled to office

  • Positive moves for healthy foods

  • Thanks from the Super Bowl XLVI Host Committee

  • Doctor’s diet plan helps her arthritis

  • Great support for fundraiser

  • A few thoughts moving forward

  February 12, 2012  

• READER'S FORUM: Feb. 11, 2012

  • Controlling crows everyone’s job

  • Strong plan needed to fight Alzheimer’s

  February 11, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 10, 2012

  • How about a parade for war veterans?
  
  • Rubber reptiles will chase off crows
   

  February 10, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 9, 2012

  • Award proves art teacher’s special

  • Technicality hits cancer patient

  February 9, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 8, 2012

  • City engineer sets high standard

  • More than paper to protect rights

  February 8, 2012  

• Readers' Forum: Feb. 7, 2012

  • Kodak moment for America?

  • Let’s not bring back serfdom

  • IU-Purdue game a nice diversion

  February 7, 2012  

• READERS FORUM: Feb. 5, 2012

  • Why does Howey keep attacking Mourdock?

  • Thanks for the commitment

  • Accurate view of pipeline issue

  • Oil pipeline is a pipe dream

  • Not all workers belong to unions

  • Unions protect working people

  • Terre Haute Zoning issue unites neighbors

  February 5, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 4, 2012

  • Defending Bain, attacking Harrop, praising Romney

  • Break a CFL? No reason to panic

  • GOP’s timing not so super

  February 4, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 3, 2012

  • Keep pressure on the Pentagon

  • Supportive words for Jim Mann
   

  February 3, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 2, 2012

  • There are reasons unions are needed

  • Why so hard to get a tow here?

  February 2, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Feb. 1, 2012

  • Better options for Deming Park area

  • Tuskegee Airmen had local member

  February 1, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 31, 2012

  • Science from the heavens
  • Unions exist to aid the worker
   

  January 31, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 30, 2012

  • Right-to-work bill hurts state’s workers

  January 30, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 29, 2012

  • Obama wrong on recess appointments

  • Thanks for honoring ‘Soup’ at his passing

  • Mercury more danger than coal emission?

  • Beware employers who cut corners

  • All beliefs need to be respected

  • People’s decency becomes evident

  January 29, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 28, 2012

  • Don’t muzzle North’s ‘Woelf Pack’

  • The true legacy of coach Paterno

  • Bullet holes suggest dangerous gun use

  • Union coercion in right-to-work issue

  January 28, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 27, 2012

  • Labor bill would divide unions
  
  • GOP sure to retain Statehouse control
  
  • Internet lies about liberalism and more
  
  • National debt backs job growth numbers
  
   

  January 27, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 26, 2012

  • Right-to-work law wrong for workers

  • Put labor law on the ballot

  January 26, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 24, 2012

  • Super Bowl raises parking, gas prices
  
  • Obama should OK energy job issue
  
   

  January 24, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 23, 2012

  • Keystone pipeline is needed now

  • Great seasons for South Vigo sports

  January 23, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 22, 2012

  • Distorted view of mine’s practices

  • Planning is necessary to ensure free market

  • Bring back one-class tourney

  • Wonderful book for a great cause

  • Liberals no longer hold moral ground

  • Another great holiday tourney

  • A few things to think about

  January 22, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 21, 2012

  • Protect our kids from mercury

  • Older drivers have safety opportunity

  January 21, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 20, 2012

  • Workers should pay fair share
   

  January 20, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 19, 2012

  • Two sides to labor issue

  • Learn more about right-to-work law

  January 19, 2012  

• READERS’ FORUM: Jan. 18, 2012

  • Facts show labor bill is bad idea

  • Rural road needs more attention

  January 18, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 17, 2012

  • Embracing those liberal definitions
  
  • People responded to help after mishap
   

  January 17, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 15, 2012

  • Breaking unions and middle class

  • Union dues have favorable results

  • Labor law hasn’t hurt fed workers

  • Labor bill mean and destructive

  • Indiana’s friendly business confines

  • Ideal spot for new housing

  • Americans need some motivation

  January 15, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 14, 2011

  • Solutions lie in compromise

  January 14, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 13, 2012

  • Great stories to warm your heart
   

  January 13, 2012  

• READERS' FORUM: Jan. 12, 2012

  Interference? No.
  Opportunity? Yes

  January 12, 2012  

• More Letters Headlines

© 2012 Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc. · CNHI Classified Advertising Network · CNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2012. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope. Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
Privacy Policy | AP News Registry privacy policy
Terms and Conditions
Advertiser Index

Events by eviesays.com

News From Terre Haute, Indiana 222 S 7th St Terre Haute, IN 47807