Those who favor nationalized health care insist capitalism has failed us (in this area) as costs continue to climb and 45 million Americans remain uninsured. Those on the other side of the debate note that there hasn’t been a free market approach to U.S. health care in nearly 50 years, due to Medicare. Moreover, they claim it’s no coincidence that medical costs began rising shortly after Medicare was instituted.
Medicare proponents insist that skyrocketing costs are not due to the nature of the Medicare program itself, but rather from the continuing sharp rise in health care costs throughout the U.S. system. Admittedly, the cost of modern technology plays a major role. In 1953, when I was born, the largest expense for most hospitals was linen.
Concerning the alleged 45 million uninsured: Mark Steyn notes that one-fifth have access to medical coverage (Medicaid) but haven’t enrolled; one-fifth aren’t Americans; two-fifths are young, mobile and roughly 25 years of age (read: immortal); the remaining fifth are wealthier than the insured population. Steyn cites a 2006 Census Bureau report indicating that 19 percent of the uninsured have household incomes over $75,000. He thinks the wealthy have been “fleeing insurance” as they seek to make medical procedures a normal market transaction.
To that point, analysts agree that prices won’t moderate until third-party-payers (whether government or private) are removed from the equation. Unless Americans begin paying for their medical care out of their own pockets prices will continue to skyrocket. Thus, the growing popularity of health savings accounts (HSAs) which allow individuals to negotiate prices with their providers.
One sector of U.S. medicine where capitalism thrives is cosmetic surgery. (Lasik eye surgery being a good example.) Even as the technology increases, prices continue to plummet. The reason for this is that there is no third-party-payer. Consumers shop for the best price because they are writing the check. As a result, fee competition among doctors is fierce.
Regina Herzlinger suggests we change “the income-tax system so that employed enrollees understand that their income funds the purchase of health benefits. The most direct way would be to make the money spent on health insurance available as cash, tax free, to employees. For example, my employer, Harvard University, could offer me a tax-free raise for the $15,000 of my income that it currently spends to purchase my health insurance. As I would, many of Harvard’s employees would opt to take the money and buy their own insurance, helping to create a genuine consumer-driven market.”
Herzlinger says, “a public payer can reduce costs only by rationing health care, especially to the sick, who account for most of the expenditures. Thus, the United Kingdom’s single-payer system features the lowest usage of cancer drugs among the Big 5 European economies, and commensurately low cancer-survival rates.”
To expand on Herzlinger’s point: What is the moral justification of having the state decide what medical care to ration? Such policies have an Orwellian flavor that many Americans find distasteful.
Some insist Medicare is more efficient than the private sector. “In comparison, Medicare seems efficient,” writes Herzlinger, “but only if some inconvenient truths are ignored. If Medicare followed private-sector accounting, its yearly expenses would increase by $1 trillion to reflect its $34 trillion in unfunded liabilities. And it must be taken into account that private insurance firms currently subsidize the discount of roughly 15 percent that the monopolistic Medicare extracts from its suppliers.”
Consider: Medicare faces $34 trillion in unfunded liabilities and President Obama wants to add 45 million people to the bankrupt system.
Obama’s health-care model is the Canadian system. Canada’s mortality rate for colon cancer is higher than the U.S. because the Canadian government refuses to purchase the two most effective drugs to treat the disease. The proportion of middle-aged Canadian women who have never had a mammogram is twice that of the U.S., and three times as many Canadian women have never had a Pap smear. John Goodman, of the National Center for Policy Analysis, suggests this lack of screening is partly responsible for the fact that the mortality rate in Canada is 25 percent higher for breast cancer.
Nor is it all about medicine. Industry experts note that about 70 percent of medical costs are “lifestyle driven.” The CDC reports that 26.1 percent of Americans are obese. It’s estimated that if we could get Americans back to 1991 weight levels we would save a trillion dollars. Physicians at the famed Cleveland Clinic draw a sharp distinction between “health care” and “medical care.” Health care is (your) responsibility, not your doctor’s.
Studies demonstrate that Mormons live about 10 years longer than the rest of us. Does Utah have better docs? No. The answer lies in the fact that Mormons embrace lifestyle choices that are less destructive than those chosen by the general population. As with so much in life, personal responsibility plays a major role in remaining healthy. Many readers are probably nodding in agreement … as they reach for another slice of extra-thick bacon.
Those advocating a public option point out that America’s health-care system ranks a dismal 37th, according to the World Health Organization.
Comparing the heterogeneous population of the U.S. with the homogeneous populations of European countries is an old canard and rarely yields useful data.
Utah compares favorably with any country one cares to cite. Whereas Texas, with its high minority population, tends to compare unfavorably. But these outcomes have little to do with the health care systems in the two states.
Infant mortality is another area in which the U.S. appears to be lagging (until one looks at how the data are gathered). U.S. doctors and hospitals do heroic work in saving very-low-birth-weight infants. While many nations make little or no attempt at saving such infants. They aren’t even recorded as “live born” and are not counted in infant mortality statistics. British guidelines advise against care for babies born before 22 weeks.
The fact that many women in the U.S. fail to avail themselves of prenatal care — even when it’s free — cannot be blamed on the fault of our health-care system.
While we might debate its affordability, there is no debating the fact that U.S. medicine is the best in the world. When American billionaires become seriously ill — as did Steve Jobs, earlier this year — they seek treatment (here).
Much is made of the fact that U.S. life expectancy is a bit shorter than that of other countries. But if you adjust for violent crime and automobile accidents Americans have the longest life expectancy.
— Reggie McConnell
Terre Haute
Flashpoint
FLASHPOINT: Cure for the health care system: More capitalism
- Flashpoint
-
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
FLASHPOINT: School libraries essential for reading achievement
If the situation were not so serious, it would be laughable. How can we improve reading achievement if we make it more difficult to put books in the hands of our children?
-
FLASHPOINT: Lugar warns of 'unrelenting partisan mindset'
I would like to comment on the Senate race just concluded and the direction of American politics and the Republican Party.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is money a problem in politics? Depends on where you sit
The role of money in politics needs to be better understood. Does it make the political system work better, or is it a problem — and if so, how much of one?
-
FLASHPOINT: ‘Private’ clubs should be exempt from smoking bans
Over the past several years I have watched the Vigo County Council, followed by the City Council, and lastly the legislature of the great state of Indiana, wrestle with a smoking ban.
-
FLASHPOINT: Downtown developers should share more details on project
With all of the opinions being expressed about the fate of the 500 block of Wabash Avenue, one element is sorely missing: the details.
-
FLASHPOINT: Be careful when making accusations of ‘racism’
Perhaps, in a way that he doesn’t understand, Attorney General Eric Holder is correct in accusing America of being cowardly about discussing issues of race.
-
FLASHPOINT: Historic hotel demolition was shameful day for Terre Haute
In an April 13 article on the potential demolition of historic buildings at Fifth and Wabash for student housing, Mike Ellis says, “I love the old historic buildings and have always had a passion to see them saved and restored. I was an opponent of seeing the Terre Haute House come down and the new hotel go up,” he said. “I have been proven wrong with what that would do for Terre Haute.”
-
FLASHPOINT: Notes on saving structural history
There are several reasons why the historic buildings adjacent and west of Roger’s Jewelers should be saved, and why our downtown needs to protect and embrace our remaining historic fabric. First and foremost, rehab and reuse saves our historic buildings for future generations to experience, and the more architectural authenticity our downtown preserves, the more admired and “walkable” it will become.
-
FLASHPOINT: Can anyone hear the call from Farrington's Grove
On Friday, March 30, a dear friend was brutally attacked in broad daylight in an alley in the neighborhood I grew up in, on the edge of Farrington’s Grove.
-
FLASHPOINT: We have the power to co-exist without violence or prejudice
Innumerable forces in our lives, and throughout our society, seem to have convinced us that immediacy is best. We have to do it now. We have to have it now. We must go there now. We need it now!
-
FLASHPOINT: Issue surrounding Florida shooting fueled by race
I am writing as a mother and as president of the Terre Haute branch of the NAACP because there may be some who wonder why the shooting of Trayvon Martin has created such an uproar: “What exactly is the issue?”
-
FLASHPOINT: Indiana — open for business
With the 2012 legislative session in the rearview mirror, the two-year work of the 117th General Assembly elected in November of 2010 is complete.
-
FLASHPOINT: The Constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act
On March 26, the United States Supreme Court will begin three days of hearings with six hours of oral argument on the constitutional challenge filed by Indiana and 25 other states against certain sections of the federal health care law: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often referred to as “Obamacare.” This historic lawsuit will explore the limits of the power of Congress under the U.S. Constitution.
-
FLASHPOINT: The burning questions of ‘Fahrenheit 451’
“Remember the firemen are rarely necessary. The public stopped reading of its own accord.” — Ray Bradbury, “Fahrenheit 451”
-
FLASHPOINT: Wonderful place to be during a very hard time
University Hospital (Indianapolis), part of IU Health Group, is a wonderful place to be if you are seriously ill.
-
FLASHPOINT: America’s energy brings America jobs
The increase in fuel prices affects many aspects of our daily lives.
-
FLASHPOINT: Change coming to the Indiana Statehouse
The General Assembly is about to undergo a major face-lift. I’m not talking about new construction. I’m talking about destruction — partisan destruction, in fact.
-
FLASHPOINT: White House rejects Keystone XL: Sad day for U.S. workers
Imagine a project that could create 20,000 American jobs during construction, and as many as half a million longer-term positions.
-
FLASHPOINT: Graduation rates are up; great news for Indiana
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride.
-
FLASHPOINT: Tech trail leading us into a dense, digital forest
It seems the Southwest Parke schools are the latest to play the laptop lottery game.
-
FLASHPOINT: Republicans enable war on middle class, unions
About six years ago at the pinnacle of the Bush/GOP Dictatorship, I began telling you that the wealthy and Corporate America were laying the ground work to politically, financially and physically take over America.
-
FLASHPOINT: Howey ignores truth to advance his agenda
Brian Howey’s Jan. 8 column about the U.S. Senate race proves once again that he will not allow the facts or journalistic ethics to get in the way of attacking Richard Mourdock and promoting his chosen candidate, Dick Lugar.
-
FLASHPOINT: Putting fairness first
This time of year, with chords of Auld Lang Syne still ringing in our ears, it’s not uncommon or unnatural to think of days gone by as being more desirable than the era we live in today.
-
FLASHPOINT: What really motivates right-to-work proposal?
You may have heard about the upcoming “right-to-work” legislation before our lawmakers in the next session of “law making.”
-
FLASHPOINT: The right-to-work debate: ‘Devil at Our Doorstep’
As the 2012 Indiana Legislative Assembly convenes, January will represent a tipping point for all Hoosiers’ individual freedoms as politicians and Big Labor draw battle lines to determine if Indiana will become the 23rd right-to-work state.
-
FLASHPOINT: State’s House Democrats will offer alternative for job creation
As the leaders of single-party control in state government outline their agendas for the 2012 session of the Indiana General Assembly, it is easy to be cynical about their intentions in the months to come.
-
FLASHPOINT: Community colleges must lead way in reshaping higher education
In the 1970s, I began what was three decades in the automotive industry. ... Today, in my position as president of Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, I see higher education confronted with some of these same challenges.
-
FLASHPOINT: There’s little right about ‘right to work’ proposal
The danger contained in these three simple words – “Right to Work” — is that they sound so innocent.
- More Flashpoint Headlines
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?




