The danger contained in these three simple words – “Right to Work” — is that they sound so innocent.
Who could be against having the right to work?
But there is nothing simple or innocent about a proposal with a documented history of cutting pay for workers, reducing benefits they earn to support their families, and reducing safety in their workplaces.
There is a very good reason it is called “Right to Work For Less.”
RTW For Less says: If you work at a place with union representation, you can reap the benefits that come from collective bargaining – salaries, health care – but refuse to pay your share of the costs of negotiating those benefits.
What would happen if an employee at a union business decided to stop paying dues, then gets injured on the job? This worker would get the same protections received by a worker who pays union dues, even though he doesn’t pay for those protections.
Does this sound fair to you? To be able to reap the benefits paid for by others? I don’t think so.
Mind you, this is an issue only in a union shop. If you don’t work for a union business, then you’re not paying dues or representation fees. The only businesses affected by RTW For Less laws are those that have chosen to negotiate with employee unions.
So if union shops are the only places affected, then how does the preservation of bargaining rights in Indiana keep any businesses from coming to our state?
It doesn’t.
During last summer’s hearings on RTW, not one shred of evidence was presented that proved any business refused to come to Indiana because we allow workers and businesses the freedom to collectively bargain.
Indiana’s top economic development official couldn’t name a single company that chose to locate elsewhere because Indiana refused to be a RTW For Less state.
There are no facts proving that Indiana could benefit by becoming a RTW For Less state. There have never been any findings that prove RTW For Less will help lure jobs to our communities.
By contrast, here are some easily verifiable facts:
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average worker in a RTW For Less state makes substantially less than a worker in a non-RTW state. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, RTW For Less states have a higher poverty level. Workplace deaths are more than 50 percent higher in RTW For Less states, while workers injured on the job in those states receive lesser benefits.
Let’s look at the experiences of just two of the 22 RTW For Less states in this country.
Mississippi, which passed RTW For Less in 1954, consistently has ranked dead last in the nation in its ability to attract jobs. Its workers earn less than 80 cents on the dollar compared with the average U.S. worker.
Since Oklahoma passed RTW For Less in 2001, manufacturing jobs have disappeared. The Oklahoma Department of Commerce reported the state is attracting 33 percent fewer firms and jobs. Instead of losing jobs to competing states, Oklahoma jobs are going overseas, where no state can compete with the low wages offered in foreign countries.
Indiana already ranks in the top tier in the assets it provides to attract jobs. In the current economy, why would the Republican majorities at the Statehouse want to risk enacting a policy that could easily throw us back into the depths of recession? Furthermore, why would these majorities be so steadfast in their pursuit of a policy opposed by Hoosiers, according to a recent poll?
Because there is only one group that benefits from RTW For Less.
Big business. It reduces the costs of paying salaries and benefits to their workers, which increases their profits.
Hoosier workers already earn only 86 cents on the dollar, compared to other workers across this country. Bringing RTW For Less to Indiana will be just another step on our race to the bottom.
Yet Right to Work For Less will be offered by the Republican majorities in the 2012 legislative session as their grand plan to create jobs.
That may sound like a joke, but it becomes something far more serious when you hear supporters claim that RTW For Less will be our state’s way to find work for Hoosier veterans returning from service overseas.
Think about that for a minute. Here is the message we are sending these men and women:
You have put your life at risk defending our country. Here will be your reward.
There will be few new jobs. The jobs that are created will have low wages and benefits, and you’ll be working in a place where safety takes a back seat to putting more money in the pockets of your bosses.
Forgive me for thinking that Indiana can do a whole lot better.
State Rep. David Niezgodski (D-South Bend) is the ranking Democrat on the House Employment, Labor and Pensions Committee.
Flashpoint
FLASHPOINT: There’s little right about ‘right to work’ proposal
- Flashpoint
-
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
FLASHPOINT: School libraries essential for reading achievement
If the situation were not so serious, it would be laughable. How can we improve reading achievement if we make it more difficult to put books in the hands of our children?
-
FLASHPOINT: Lugar warns of 'unrelenting partisan mindset'
I would like to comment on the Senate race just concluded and the direction of American politics and the Republican Party.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is money a problem in politics? Depends on where you sit
The role of money in politics needs to be better understood. Does it make the political system work better, or is it a problem — and if so, how much of one?
-
FLASHPOINT: ‘Private’ clubs should be exempt from smoking bans
Over the past several years I have watched the Vigo County Council, followed by the City Council, and lastly the legislature of the great state of Indiana, wrestle with a smoking ban.
-
FLASHPOINT: Downtown developers should share more details on project
With all of the opinions being expressed about the fate of the 500 block of Wabash Avenue, one element is sorely missing: the details.
-
FLASHPOINT: Be careful when making accusations of ‘racism’
Perhaps, in a way that he doesn’t understand, Attorney General Eric Holder is correct in accusing America of being cowardly about discussing issues of race.
-
FLASHPOINT: Historic hotel demolition was shameful day for Terre Haute
In an April 13 article on the potential demolition of historic buildings at Fifth and Wabash for student housing, Mike Ellis says, “I love the old historic buildings and have always had a passion to see them saved and restored. I was an opponent of seeing the Terre Haute House come down and the new hotel go up,” he said. “I have been proven wrong with what that would do for Terre Haute.”
-
FLASHPOINT: Notes on saving structural history
There are several reasons why the historic buildings adjacent and west of Roger’s Jewelers should be saved, and why our downtown needs to protect and embrace our remaining historic fabric. First and foremost, rehab and reuse saves our historic buildings for future generations to experience, and the more architectural authenticity our downtown preserves, the more admired and “walkable” it will become.
-
FLASHPOINT: Can anyone hear the call from Farrington's Grove
On Friday, March 30, a dear friend was brutally attacked in broad daylight in an alley in the neighborhood I grew up in, on the edge of Farrington’s Grove.
-
FLASHPOINT: We have the power to co-exist without violence or prejudice
Innumerable forces in our lives, and throughout our society, seem to have convinced us that immediacy is best. We have to do it now. We have to have it now. We must go there now. We need it now!
-
FLASHPOINT: Issue surrounding Florida shooting fueled by race
I am writing as a mother and as president of the Terre Haute branch of the NAACP because there may be some who wonder why the shooting of Trayvon Martin has created such an uproar: “What exactly is the issue?”
-
FLASHPOINT: Indiana — open for business
With the 2012 legislative session in the rearview mirror, the two-year work of the 117th General Assembly elected in November of 2010 is complete.
-
FLASHPOINT: The Constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act
On March 26, the United States Supreme Court will begin three days of hearings with six hours of oral argument on the constitutional challenge filed by Indiana and 25 other states against certain sections of the federal health care law: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often referred to as “Obamacare.” This historic lawsuit will explore the limits of the power of Congress under the U.S. Constitution.
-
FLASHPOINT: The burning questions of ‘Fahrenheit 451’
“Remember the firemen are rarely necessary. The public stopped reading of its own accord.” — Ray Bradbury, “Fahrenheit 451”
-
FLASHPOINT: Wonderful place to be during a very hard time
University Hospital (Indianapolis), part of IU Health Group, is a wonderful place to be if you are seriously ill.
-
FLASHPOINT: America’s energy brings America jobs
The increase in fuel prices affects many aspects of our daily lives.
-
FLASHPOINT: Change coming to the Indiana Statehouse
The General Assembly is about to undergo a major face-lift. I’m not talking about new construction. I’m talking about destruction — partisan destruction, in fact.
-
FLASHPOINT: White House rejects Keystone XL: Sad day for U.S. workers
Imagine a project that could create 20,000 American jobs during construction, and as many as half a million longer-term positions.
-
FLASHPOINT: Graduation rates are up; great news for Indiana
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride.
-
FLASHPOINT: Tech trail leading us into a dense, digital forest
It seems the Southwest Parke schools are the latest to play the laptop lottery game.
-
FLASHPOINT: Republicans enable war on middle class, unions
About six years ago at the pinnacle of the Bush/GOP Dictatorship, I began telling you that the wealthy and Corporate America were laying the ground work to politically, financially and physically take over America.
-
FLASHPOINT: Howey ignores truth to advance his agenda
Brian Howey’s Jan. 8 column about the U.S. Senate race proves once again that he will not allow the facts or journalistic ethics to get in the way of attacking Richard Mourdock and promoting his chosen candidate, Dick Lugar.
-
FLASHPOINT: Putting fairness first
This time of year, with chords of Auld Lang Syne still ringing in our ears, it’s not uncommon or unnatural to think of days gone by as being more desirable than the era we live in today.
-
FLASHPOINT: What really motivates right-to-work proposal?
You may have heard about the upcoming “right-to-work” legislation before our lawmakers in the next session of “law making.”
-
FLASHPOINT: The right-to-work debate: ‘Devil at Our Doorstep’
As the 2012 Indiana Legislative Assembly convenes, January will represent a tipping point for all Hoosiers’ individual freedoms as politicians and Big Labor draw battle lines to determine if Indiana will become the 23rd right-to-work state.
-
FLASHPOINT: State’s House Democrats will offer alternative for job creation
As the leaders of single-party control in state government outline their agendas for the 2012 session of the Indiana General Assembly, it is easy to be cynical about their intentions in the months to come.
-
FLASHPOINT: Community colleges must lead way in reshaping higher education
In the 1970s, I began what was three decades in the automotive industry. ... Today, in my position as president of Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, I see higher education confronted with some of these same challenges.
-
FLASHPOINT: There’s little right about ‘right to work’ proposal
The danger contained in these three simple words – “Right to Work” — is that they sound so innocent.
-
FLASHPOINT: The next big movement? Reform Congress
We are living through one of the most remarkable times in recent history.
- More Flashpoint Headlines
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan




