In his recent opinion piece (June 5, Page C1) Arthur Foulkes provides two bits of economic common sense combined with two fundamental errors in economic reasoning and a handful of statements that are simply not true. The whole adds up to a skeptical analysis of recent initiatives of the Obama administration that, while appealing to an undiscriminating reader, ultimately makes little sense.
One bit of sense is that social well-being is not promoted by resource use, but by wealth creation. Although wealth creation often involves the productive use of resources, the focus should be on the former rather than the latter. The other bit is realizing that creating a job in one activity (say, green energy production) may well destroy a job in another (say, coal mining). So job creation, like resource use, should not in general be a policy objective. But this cuts both ways. Just as pursuit of green jobs may not result in net job creation, neither does environmental regulation result in net job destruction.
The two fundamental errors are ignoring the current underutilization of the nation’s resources and assuming that output measured by gross domestic product (GDP) is the appropriate measure of wealth creation. The selective examples in Foulkes’ essay ignore that a significant part of the American labor force is idle. Finding ways to get these people back to work, which is the central objective of the macroeconomic policy undertaken by the Obama administration, will lead to greater output without leading to job destruction elsewhere. In a situation of full employment and no growth in the labor force, the creation of jobs in one sector would, of course, imply that jobs elsewhere are lost. But this is not the current condition of the nation’s economy. We have a growing labor force that is significantly underutilized.
Foulkes makes a common error in identifying the conventional measure of output, GDP, as the source of social wealth. True, the provision of food, clothing, shelter and the like, captured in this measure, do contribute to social well-being and thus to wealth. But so does environmental quality — which is not captured by GDP. The mistaken logic is evident in his statement that “banning one form of production to stimulate an alternative form of production seems like a strange way to make people better off.” This is strange only because of the distorted and limited context Foulkes provides. By recognizing that different degrees of well-being are created by different forms of production, including the production (or preservation) of environmental quality, shifting between alternative forms of production makes a lot of sense.
The fundamental point — that GDP is not an appropriate measure of a nation’s wealth creation — is contained in every basic economics textbook I have ever read (and I’ve read several). The creation of the system of national accounts, on which the GDP is based, was never intended for this purpose. GDP has been hijacked by journalists and unenlightened policy makers for this use, but this is a mistake and leads to mistaken policies. Thus even if the Obama administration were to pursue green jobs in a situation of full employment, destroying other jobs in the process, it would not necessarily be contrary to the goal of wealth creation.
The Obama policy is actually clever by pursuing two goals at once. As long as a federal stimulus is called for to restore economic output to its potential level, why not use the opportunity to shift the composition of output away from polluting activities? This makes a lot of sense if the prior composition underrepresented environmental goals.
Since environmental goals are not well represented in markets, because of ill-defined property rights (a point that seems to escape Foulkes despite his common refrain on property rights), public policy that shifts the balance toward less environmental damage is eminently appropriate. And, by the way, the “cap and trade” system for addressing carbon emissions, which has been much maligned in Indiana, is essentially a mechanism for creating and trading relevant property rights.
Further misunderstanding of economics is evident in Foulkes’ implicit suggestion that environmental goals should just wait for more wealth creation. Then they will be taken care of by market processes with no need for regulatory intervention. After all, we see a clear correlation between wealth levels and environmental quality.
There is so much wrong with this that I cannot correct it all in the space allowed, so I will make two short points. First, in countries where we see better environmental quality we also see it supported by regulation. Second, environmental quality is not merely a consumption good, but is also an input to production. Healthy people and healthy fisheries produce more — even of conventional output as captured in GDP. Thus the cause behind the correlation runs in part from environment to wealth rather than the other way around.
— Richard Lotspeich
Department of Economics
Indiana State University
Flashpoint
Flashpoint: What’s wrong with green jobs? Partial analysis misleads us again
- Flashpoint
-
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year.
-
FLASHPOINT:Bipartisan vs. Nonpartisan
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress.
-
FLASHPOINT: School libraries essential for reading achievement
If the situation were not so serious, it would be laughable. How can we improve reading achievement if we make it more difficult to put books in the hands of our children?
-
FLASHPOINT: Lugar warns of 'unrelenting partisan mindset'
I would like to comment on the Senate race just concluded and the direction of American politics and the Republican Party.
-
FLASHPOINT: Is money a problem in politics? Depends on where you sit
The role of money in politics needs to be better understood. Does it make the political system work better, or is it a problem — and if so, how much of one?
-
FLASHPOINT: ‘Private’ clubs should be exempt from smoking bans
Over the past several years I have watched the Vigo County Council, followed by the City Council, and lastly the legislature of the great state of Indiana, wrestle with a smoking ban.
-
FLASHPOINT: Downtown developers should share more details on project
With all of the opinions being expressed about the fate of the 500 block of Wabash Avenue, one element is sorely missing: the details.
-
FLASHPOINT: Be careful when making accusations of ‘racism’
Perhaps, in a way that he doesn’t understand, Attorney General Eric Holder is correct in accusing America of being cowardly about discussing issues of race.
-
FLASHPOINT: Historic hotel demolition was shameful day for Terre Haute
In an April 13 article on the potential demolition of historic buildings at Fifth and Wabash for student housing, Mike Ellis says, “I love the old historic buildings and have always had a passion to see them saved and restored. I was an opponent of seeing the Terre Haute House come down and the new hotel go up,” he said. “I have been proven wrong with what that would do for Terre Haute.”
-
FLASHPOINT: Notes on saving structural history
There are several reasons why the historic buildings adjacent and west of Roger’s Jewelers should be saved, and why our downtown needs to protect and embrace our remaining historic fabric. First and foremost, rehab and reuse saves our historic buildings for future generations to experience, and the more architectural authenticity our downtown preserves, the more admired and “walkable” it will become.
-
FLASHPOINT: Can anyone hear the call from Farrington's Grove
On Friday, March 30, a dear friend was brutally attacked in broad daylight in an alley in the neighborhood I grew up in, on the edge of Farrington’s Grove.
-
FLASHPOINT: We have the power to co-exist without violence or prejudice
Innumerable forces in our lives, and throughout our society, seem to have convinced us that immediacy is best. We have to do it now. We have to have it now. We must go there now. We need it now!
-
FLASHPOINT: Issue surrounding Florida shooting fueled by race
I am writing as a mother and as president of the Terre Haute branch of the NAACP because there may be some who wonder why the shooting of Trayvon Martin has created such an uproar: “What exactly is the issue?”
-
FLASHPOINT: Indiana — open for business
With the 2012 legislative session in the rearview mirror, the two-year work of the 117th General Assembly elected in November of 2010 is complete.
-
FLASHPOINT: The Constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act
On March 26, the United States Supreme Court will begin three days of hearings with six hours of oral argument on the constitutional challenge filed by Indiana and 25 other states against certain sections of the federal health care law: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often referred to as “Obamacare.” This historic lawsuit will explore the limits of the power of Congress under the U.S. Constitution.
-
FLASHPOINT: The burning questions of ‘Fahrenheit 451’
“Remember the firemen are rarely necessary. The public stopped reading of its own accord.” — Ray Bradbury, “Fahrenheit 451”
-
FLASHPOINT: Wonderful place to be during a very hard time
University Hospital (Indianapolis), part of IU Health Group, is a wonderful place to be if you are seriously ill.
-
FLASHPOINT: America’s energy brings America jobs
The increase in fuel prices affects many aspects of our daily lives.
-
FLASHPOINT: Change coming to the Indiana Statehouse
The General Assembly is about to undergo a major face-lift. I’m not talking about new construction. I’m talking about destruction — partisan destruction, in fact.
-
FLASHPOINT: White House rejects Keystone XL: Sad day for U.S. workers
Imagine a project that could create 20,000 American jobs during construction, and as many as half a million longer-term positions.
-
FLASHPOINT: Graduation rates are up; great news for Indiana
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride.
-
FLASHPOINT: Tech trail leading us into a dense, digital forest
It seems the Southwest Parke schools are the latest to play the laptop lottery game.
-
FLASHPOINT: Republicans enable war on middle class, unions
About six years ago at the pinnacle of the Bush/GOP Dictatorship, I began telling you that the wealthy and Corporate America were laying the ground work to politically, financially and physically take over America.
-
FLASHPOINT: Howey ignores truth to advance his agenda
Brian Howey’s Jan. 8 column about the U.S. Senate race proves once again that he will not allow the facts or journalistic ethics to get in the way of attacking Richard Mourdock and promoting his chosen candidate, Dick Lugar.
-
FLASHPOINT: Putting fairness first
This time of year, with chords of Auld Lang Syne still ringing in our ears, it’s not uncommon or unnatural to think of days gone by as being more desirable than the era we live in today.
-
FLASHPOINT: What really motivates right-to-work proposal?
You may have heard about the upcoming “right-to-work” legislation before our lawmakers in the next session of “law making.”
-
FLASHPOINT: The right-to-work debate: ‘Devil at Our Doorstep’
As the 2012 Indiana Legislative Assembly convenes, January will represent a tipping point for all Hoosiers’ individual freedoms as politicians and Big Labor draw battle lines to determine if Indiana will become the 23rd right-to-work state.
-
FLASHPOINT: State’s House Democrats will offer alternative for job creation
As the leaders of single-party control in state government outline their agendas for the 2012 session of the Indiana General Assembly, it is easy to be cynical about their intentions in the months to come.
-
FLASHPOINT: Community colleges must lead way in reshaping higher education
In the 1970s, I began what was three decades in the automotive industry. ... Today, in my position as president of Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, I see higher education confronted with some of these same challenges.
-
FLASHPOINT: There’s little right about ‘right to work’ proposal
The danger contained in these three simple words – “Right to Work” — is that they sound so innocent.
- More Flashpoint Headlines
-
FLASHPOINT: Is this really the best we can do?




