TERRE HAUTE — The League of Women Voters is at its core about the enfranchisement of all citizens, with no room in its values for discrimination, whether it be on the basis of gender, race or some other qualifier. With a long history of involvement in suffrage movements and voting rights, it is no surprise the Indiana arm took on the state’s Voter ID law, one which it viewed as treating voters unequally. In a resounding 3-0 decision Thursday, the state Court of Appeals agreed.
Indiana’s highest elected officials, themselves benefactors of voter choice, were quick to decry the court’s decision in the harshest of terms. “An act of judicial arrogance,” Gov. Mitch Daniels said of the ruling. Secretary of State Todd Rokita — the administrator of elections in the state and the person named in the challenge brought by the League of Women Voters — reduced the suit to one word: gamesmanship. Greg Zoeller, the state Attorney General, vowed to appeal the decision, sending the case to the Indiana Supreme Court.
Passed by a Republican-controlled General Assembly in 2005, the law requires voters to show a photo identification that must include an expiration date when presenting themselves at a polling site. Voters who do not have a photo ID with them are allowed to cast provisional ballots, but they must produce a photo ID to the circuit court clerk or the county election board before noon 10 days following the election for the vote to count. The intent of the law is to prevent voter fraud, an admirable goal.
It is the law’s stipulated exceptions, though, that concerned the League. Voters casting absentee ballots by mail are not required to show any proof of their identities. Also excluded are those voters living in a residential facility that happens to be a designated polling site, i.e. a nursing home.
The Appellate judges could not reconcile the inequality of requiring some voters to show a photo ID while giving others a pass. The trio concluded: “The Voter I.D. law violates Indiana Constitution Article 1, Section 23, and must be declared void because it regulates voters in a manner that is not uniform and impartial.”
Article 1, Section 23 — otherwise known as the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause — in the Constitution states: “The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.”
The court’s ruling appears soundly based in the Constitution. To accuse the court of political partisanship, as did Gov. Daniels in his post-ruling outrage, seems misplaced, even given that the judges were appointed by his predecessors, all Democrats.
In their 29-page opinion, the judges acknowledge that the Voter ID law may be fixable, but repairmen they are not; the judicial branch of government is expressly forbidden by the Constitution to tinker in functions of the legislative or executive branches.
If the Indiana Attorney General is determined to “vigorously defend” the statute by appealing to the state Supreme Court, he is well within his rights, though as taxpayers we question the expenditure of more money to defend a bad law.
Better still, the General Assembly should go back to the drawing board — erase it — then tackle anew the problem of voter fraud, minus a formula that discriminates.
Editorials
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: Court of Appeals wise to void Voter ID law
Requiring some to show identification while giving others a pass is discriminatory
- Editorials
-
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville
In the era of instant communication, the past seems to arrive much quicker.
-
EDITORIAL: Towering response
It comes as incredibly sad news that a Garfield Towers resident has succumbed as the result of a fire last week at the northside apartment complex.
-
EDITORIAL: Independent running mates
Almost certainly, running mates will not influence voters choosing Indiana’s next governor.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Cream of the crop
• Keep the ideas flowing
• Remembering fallen officers
-
EDITORIAL: Hazards of the spring abundant now on I-70
A major holiday weekend is approaching. The weather has been consistently inviting for travel and outdoor activity. Gas prices are even inching downward.
-
EDITORIAL: Embrace the Sycamores
Terre Haute should understand the rarity of an opportunity to celebrate a championship.
-
EDITORIAL: Good choice for stability
For the first time in 25 years, Indiana will have a new chief justice for its Supreme Court. For those who value stability on the state’s highest court — and we count ourselves among those who do — the appointment Tuesday of longtime Justice Brent Dickson is good news.
-
EDITORIAL: Correcting the prison imbalance
Terre Haute will no longer count federal prisoners when the city slices its population into six equal City Council districts. That decision by the City Council last week to remove the inmates at the Terre Haute Federal Correctional Complex from the council district mathematical formula may not make waves, but it makes sense.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the News
• Sometimes bureaucracies do listen
• April hours bring May flowers
• Getting our airport off the ground
-
EDITORIAL: When it’s IU vs. UK, there’s got to be a way
If the annual Indiana-Kentucky basketball game was not significant, would the coaches of the two universities be talking like this?
-
EDITORIAL: Sen. Lugar’s compelling message
Richard Lugar, no stranger to reading political tea leaves, undoubtedly knew for weeks that defeat was coming Tuesday night in his primary fight for re-election against a more-conservative-than-thou opponent. A statement Lugar released just hours after his loss of titantic proportions indicates that the six-term incumbent saw the reality even before he knew Richard Mourdock was to be his opponent this May.
-
EDITORIAL: Reviewing the landscape
The compelling story line surrounding the race between Richard Lugar and Richard Mourdock dominated most of the local primary election chatter. With those stunning results now in the books and Mourdock heading toward a showdown with Democratic Party nominee Joe Donnelly of South Bend (the current U.S. House rep from the 2nd District), it’s time to survey the landscape for other general election races that will be worthy of attention.
-
EDITORIAL: GOP changed; Lugar didn’t
Six terms. Overwhelming popularity. A statesman and a gentleman. A visionary. An icon in the annals of U.S. Senate leadership, even world leadership. So dominating on the political landscape that the opposing party did not even produce a candidate in the last election.
-
EDITORIAL: An exercise in democracy
Primary elections rarely draw the same levels of participation as general elections.
-
EDITORIAL: Fight against child abuse demands ongoing attention
As with many of our nation’s most maddening and perplexing social problems, one hardly knows how to fathom the egregious wrongs that occur when a child is abused.
-
EDITORIAL: A ‘giant’ for his hometown
Home is where the heart is. That’s true for all of us. In addition, your heart can take you home.
-
EDITORIAL: Curbing corruption a worthwhile crusade
If you are cynical about government, down to its most local levels, you may think it is overrun — or even controlled — by corruption.
-
EDITORIAL: The politics of Primary 2012
In less than a week, voting Hoosiers get a chance to make a statement about the future of politics in their state and beyond. But whatever that statement turns out to be, the final punctuation marks won’t be added until November. It’s possible that nothing will be settled by the end of the night May 8.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
• Their footsteps can lead us
• It would be music to his ears
• Feeding a genuine need
-
EDITORIAL: Hoosier Republicans should stick with Richard Lugar
Until late 2008, most Hoosiers were quite pleased — and in many cases, darn right proud — to call Richard Lugar their senior U.S. senator.
-
EDITORIAL: Matt Branam: 1954-2012
The sudden death of 57-year-old Matt Branam on Friday morning continues to leave an air of sadness hanging over the community.
-
EDITORIAL: A transplant from St. Ann’s
It would be understandable, for most of us, if we were madder than the opposite of heaven if a beloved, historic, personal part of our lives was to be taken away against our will.
-
EDITORIAL: Pragmatic approach to downtown development benefits community
Terre Haute has known for some time now that Indiana State University’s master plan includes creation of student residential centers off-campus in the nearby downtown area.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: A salute to pride of ’55
Terre Haute gets the chance to witness and appreciate the extent of its rich baseball legacy this Saturday. Its past and present will merge at Bob Warn Field.
-
EDITORIAL: A match of Mitt and Mitch?
Not every Indiana governor’s endorsement of a presidential candidate has made instant national news as did Mitch Daniels’ support for Mitt Romney on Wednesday.
-
EDITORIAL: Drilling for fairness
Consistency and fairness were on trial Monday as the Vigo County commissioners grappled with a controversial rezoning request from a property owner who wants to drill for oil on his land near Hawthorn Park northeast of Terre Haute.
-
EDITORIAL: Noteworthy in the news
Cheers, jeers and tears
-
EDITORIAL: Be fair, consistent, but keep smokefree ordinance on track
The steps toward a healthier, more vibrant community should continue moving forward.
-
EDITORIAL: Inspired by tradition, celebration
With the observance of Orthodox Easter on Sunday, the spring holy holidays for Christians and Jews will have passed for another year.
-
EDITORIAL: No need to sing the blues
The words from Terre Haute Board of Works President Bob Murray on Monday afternoon were as sweet to the ear as a blues riff from an electric guitar: “The bottom line is, [Blues at the Crossroads] should be able to operate just as it has before. It will get worked out.”
- More Editorials Headlines
-
EDITORIAL: Remembering Henryville




