Editorials
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: Court of Appeals wise to void Voter ID law
Requiring some to show identification while giving others a pass is discriminatory
TERRE HAUTE — The League of Women Voters is at its core about the enfranchisement of all citizens, with no room in its values for discrimination, whether it be on the basis of gender, race or some other qualifier. With a long history of involvement in suffrage movements and voting rights, it is no surprise the Indiana arm took on the state’s Voter ID law, one which it viewed as treating voters unequally. In a resounding 3-0 decision Thursday, the state Court of Appeals agreed.
Indiana’s highest elected officials, themselves benefactors of voter choice, were quick to decry the court’s decision in the harshest of terms. “An act of judicial arrogance,” Gov. Mitch Daniels said of the ruling. Secretary of State Todd Rokita — the administrator of elections in the state and the person named in the challenge brought by the League of Women Voters — reduced the suit to one word: gamesmanship. Greg Zoeller, the state Attorney General, vowed to appeal the decision, sending the case to the Indiana Supreme Court.
Passed by a Republican-controlled General Assembly in 2005, the law requires voters to show a photo identification that must include an expiration date when presenting themselves at a polling site. Voters who do not have a photo ID with them are allowed to cast provisional ballots, but they must produce a photo ID to the circuit court clerk or the county election board before noon 10 days following the election for the vote to count. The intent of the law is to prevent voter fraud, an admirable goal.
It is the law’s stipulated exceptions, though, that concerned the League. Voters casting absentee ballots by mail are not required to show any proof of their identities. Also excluded are those voters living in a residential facility that happens to be a designated polling site, i.e. a nursing home.
The Appellate judges could not reconcile the inequality of requiring some voters to show a photo ID while giving others a pass. The trio concluded: “The Voter I.D. law violates Indiana Constitution Article 1, Section 23, and must be declared void because it regulates voters in a manner that is not uniform and impartial.”
Article 1, Section 23 — otherwise known as the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause — in the Constitution states: “The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.”
The court’s ruling appears soundly based in the Constitution. To accuse the court of political partisanship, as did Gov. Daniels in his post-ruling outrage, seems misplaced, even given that the judges were appointed by his predecessors, all Democrats.
In their 29-page opinion, the judges acknowledge that the Voter ID law may be fixable, but repairmen they are not; the judicial branch of government is expressly forbidden by the Constitution to tinker in functions of the legislative or executive branches.
If the Indiana Attorney General is determined to “vigorously defend” the statute by appealing to the state Supreme Court, he is well within his rights, though as taxpayers we question the expenditure of more money to defend a bad law.
Better still, the General Assembly should go back to the drawing board — erase it — then tackle anew the problem of voter fraud, minus a formula that discriminates.
- Editorials
-
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: Presence of city’s crows nothing to cackle about
By March, almost every Terre Hautean is sick of the crows. Sick of their droppings. Sick of hearing them. Sick of hearing about them. Thank heavens, our annual flock has pretty much left town for the season.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: What does ‘bidder’ ordinance resolve?
The already complex process of bidding out public works contracts could get a whole lot more complicated under an ordinance being considered by the Terre Haute City Council. But that may be the only point on which anyone involved in this debate is willing to agree.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: ISU profs should face the realities
Hard-working faculty at colleges and universities naturally bristle when outsiders accuse them of occupying an ivory-tower or being out of touch with ordinary folks.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: ‘Men’ cooked up huge donation for Children’s Museum
The community spirit of the Wabash Valley was again on display Saturday night with the second annual “100 Men Who Cook” event to benefit the Terre Haute Children’s Museum.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: A new cycle begins in county politics
The sudden emergence four years ago of a revived and relevant Republican Party in Terre Haute and Vigo County led to the GOP capturing the prosecutor’s office and, a year later, the mayor’s office. Neither had housed a Republican in quite a while.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: Rod Henry, Honnalora Hubbard, Cam Cameron allow Terre Haute to believe in brighter days
In tough times, most of us hope there is someone in our corner, who still believes in us, our own ambassador to the world.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: Gibault needs better way to resolve school crisis
The proposal that Vigo County School Corp. sponsor a charter school at Gibault, Inc.’s campus south of Terre Haute likely will be turned down Monday night by the School Board.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: ISU men’s team an inspiring success
In some instances, above-average performance is considered routine. That’s not the case with Indiana State University men’s basketball.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: Staggering blow to ISU, but progress can proceed
When hard times hit a community — any community — the suffering tends to spread far and wide. No entity is ever immune.
-
TRIBUNE-STAR EDITORIAL: And another thing … Transparency in politics? Well, sure, but …
Hoosiers, no doubt, have many ideas about ways in which their junior U.S. senator could make them happy. But their wish lists probably don’t include what Cosmopolitan editor Kate White would like from Evan Bayh.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
